1991
DOI: 10.4141/cjps91-009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A damage index for estimating yield loss in sunflowers caused by sunflower midge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In cases where the damage was clearly intermediate between two whole ratings, half-values were assigned. A similar rating scale was used by Bracken (1991) and found to correspond closely with yield.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases where the damage was clearly intermediate between two whole ratings, half-values were assigned. A similar rating scale was used by Bracken (1991) and found to correspond closely with yield.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plants of each hybrid were planted on the same date and were treated as they reached the proper growth stage. A damage rating scale developed by Bracken (1991) was used in this and subsequent tests: 0, no distortion; 1, creases in surface of the head; 2, curling of bracts inward and slight cupping toward center of the head; 3, pronounced cupping to center of the head; 4, severe cupping to center of the head; and 5, head closed, no seeds present.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larvae develop through three instars, drop to the ground, and enter the soil in early to mid-August (Glogoza et al 1997). A second generation is possible, but in general, only the Þrst generation causes economic damage (Bracken 1990, Glogoza et al 1997.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plant damage is variable depending on the density of larvae within the sunßower head and time of year (Bracken 1990). Estimating larval populations and sunßower head damage is difÞcult because eggs and larvae can both be present over a 2-to 3-wk period (Hodgson et al 2000.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation