1976
DOI: 10.1520/jte10520j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Damage Function and Associated Failure Equations for Predicting Hold Time and Frequency Effects in Elevated Temperature, Low Cycle Fatigue

Abstract: A new approach is developed for predicting strain-controlled, low cycle fatigue life at elevated temperature using a proposed energy measure of fatigue damage. This measure of damage, defined as the net tensile hysteretic energy of the fatigue cycle, can be approximated by the damage function σTΔεp, where σT is the maximum stress in the cycle and Δεp is the inelastic strain range. The damage function is applied to predicting effects of hold time and frequency, when time-dependent damage occurs, through failure… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 334 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature [56] suggests that the plastic strain energy could be approximated as the product of the stress range, Δσ, and the plastic strain range, Δε p , determined at the mid-life hysteresis loop, instead of integrating the hysteresis area over cycles. It has been known primarily that the tensile mean stress has a detrimental effect on the fatigue lifetime [59][60], while the compressive mean stress has a beneficial effect. Therefore, the influence of mean stress has been embedded in lifetime prediction models as an additional parameter.…”
Section: Fatigue Lifetime Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature [56] suggests that the plastic strain energy could be approximated as the product of the stress range, Δσ, and the plastic strain range, Δε p , determined at the mid-life hysteresis loop, instead of integrating the hysteresis area over cycles. It has been known primarily that the tensile mean stress has a detrimental effect on the fatigue lifetime [59][60], while the compressive mean stress has a beneficial effect. Therefore, the influence of mean stress has been embedded in lifetime prediction models as an additional parameter.…”
Section: Fatigue Lifetime Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and serve as an indication of the driving force for crack extension [35] as part of a strain energy density factor (w d Áa), i.e.,…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over time, several fatigue life prediction approaches for the Low Cycle Fatigue (LCF) regime have been published in the literature; the most popular are the plastic strain-based approaches such as the Coffin-Manson model [2,3], strain energy-based criteria such the Smith-Watson-Topper (SWT) damage model [4], which can be used for both low-and highcycle fatigue conditions, and Ostergren's equation [5]. The two latest ones (i.e., SWT and Ostergren models) consider the effect of mean stress on fatigue life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a vast majority of investigations have been conducted to study the accuracy of the widely used low-cycle fatigue life equations, namely the Coffin-Manson [2,3], Smith-Watson-Topper [4], and Ostergren models [5] at room temperature, in particular [10,11]. However, only a few studies have focused on determining the parameters and evaluating the accuracy of these LCF models, for 316 stainless steel, at higher temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation