1988
DOI: 10.1080/15326348808807088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cyclic service tandem queueing model with parallel queues in the first stage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. The only difference with the model discussed in [19] is that we introduce (deterministic) switch-over times R 2 = R 3 = 2. We assume that no time is required to switch between the two queues in the first stage, so r 1 = 0.…”
Section: Applicability Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…. The only difference with the model discussed in [19] is that we introduce (deterministic) switch-over times R 2 = R 3 = 2. We assume that no time is required to switch between the two queues in the first stage, so r 1 = 0.…”
Section: Applicability Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important feature of the newly developed technique is that it can be applied to a myriad of models which lacked an analysis of the waiting-time distribution until now. One could apply the framework (possibly after some minor modifications) to obtain distributional results in all of the aforementioned special cases of the studied system [1,9,19,23,30,31,32,33,34] but also, for example, in a closed network [2], in an M/G/1 queue with permanent and transient customers [8], in a network with permanent and transient customers [3], or in a polling model with arrival rates that depend on the location of the server [4,7]. Although we study a continuous-time cyclic system with gated or exhaustive service in each queue, we may extend all results -without complicating the analysis -to discrete time, to periodic polling, to batch arrivals, or to systems with different branching-type service disciplines such as globally gated service.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. The only difference with the model discussed in [4] is that we introduce (deterministic) switch-over times r2 = r3 = 2. We assume that no time is required to switch between the two queues in the first stage, so r1 = 0.…”
Section: Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduced queueing network is very general, which is illustrated by the fact that many special cases have been studied in the past. Some special case configurations are standard polling systems [33], tandem queues [20,35], multi-stage queueing models with parallel queues [15], feedback vacation queues [7,34], symmetric feedback polling systems [32,34], systems with a waiting room [1,31], and many others. Due to the intrinsic complexity of the model, previous studies on the network in its full generality were restricted to queue lengths and waiting time distributions for stable systems under the assumption of Poisson arrivals (see [6,28,29,30]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%