2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.03.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cut-&-paste strategy for the 3-D inversion of helicopter-borne electromagnetic data — I. 3-D inversion using the explicit Jacobian and a tensor-based formulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As hydrogeophysical investigations are often conducted in areas with young, horizontal or subhorizontal substrata, physical property contrasts are generally horizontally smoothly varying. Furthermore, depending on system altitude, system frequency, and subsurface EC (Tølbøll & Christensen, 2007), HEM systems have a relatively small footprint (~100-200 m); therefore, the benefits of 2-D (e.g., Boesen et al, 2018;Li et al, 2016) and 3-D (e.g., Cox et al, 2012;Scheunert et al, 2016) inversions are limited and considered to be impractical compared to the less computationally expensive 1-D techniques. As a result, this study will focus on 1-D inversion methods only.…”
Section: Geophysical Inversionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As hydrogeophysical investigations are often conducted in areas with young, horizontal or subhorizontal substrata, physical property contrasts are generally horizontally smoothly varying. Furthermore, depending on system altitude, system frequency, and subsurface EC (Tølbøll & Christensen, 2007), HEM systems have a relatively small footprint (~100-200 m); therefore, the benefits of 2-D (e.g., Boesen et al, 2018;Li et al, 2016) and 3-D (e.g., Cox et al, 2012;Scheunert et al, 2016) inversions are limited and considered to be impractical compared to the less computationally expensive 1-D techniques. As a result, this study will focus on 1-D inversion methods only.…”
Section: Geophysical Inversionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain useful quantitative data, AEM measurements need to be converted into an EC distribution, and ultimately a groundwater salinity estimate, or to map hydrostratigraphy—this is undertaken using a process called inversion. In AEM mapping programs, a number of inversion algorithms are available for this purpose, which include 1‐D methods (Farquharson et al, ; Siemon, Auken, et al, ; Vignoli et al, ) or more complex 2‐D (Hermans et al, ) and 3‐D (Cox et al, ; Scheunert et al, ) inversions. To validate new inversion techniques (or improvements on existing algorithms), these are typically tested using a synthetic model and then applied to an area where relatively little is known about the subsurface (Auken et al, ; Farquharson et al, ; Siemon, Auken, et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As hydrogeophysical investigations are oft en conducted in areas with young, horizontal or subhorizontal substrata, physical property contrasts are generally horizontally smoothly varying. Furthermore, depending on system altitude, system frequency, and subsurface EC (Tølbøll and Christensen, 2007), HEM systems have a relatively small footprint (~100-200 m); therefore, the benefi ts of 2-D (e.g., Boesen et al, 2018;Li et al, 2016) and 3-D (e.g., Cox et al, 2012;Scheunert et al, 2016) inversions are limited and considered to be impractical compared to the less computationally expensive 1-D techniques. As a result, this study will focus on 1-D inversion methods only.…”
Section: Geophysical Inversionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain useful quantitative data, AEM measurements need to be converted into an EC distribution, and ultimately a groundwater salinity estimate, or to map hydrostratigraphy-this is undertaken using a process called inversion. In AEM mapping programs, a number of inversion algorithms are available for this purpose, which include 1-D methods (Farquharson et al, 2003;Siemon et al, 2009a;Vignoli et al, 2015), or more complex 2-D (Hermans et al, 2012) and 3-D (Cox et al, 2012;Scheunert et al, 2016) inversions. To validate new inversion techniques (or improvements on existing algorithms), these are typically tested using a synthetic model and then applied to an area where relatively little is known about the subsurface (Auken et al, 2005;Farquharson et al, 2003;Siemon et al, 2009a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%