2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-009-2063-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A CUSUM-based method for monitoring simple linear profiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The null hypothesis tested by both CUSUM and MOSUM is that regression coefficients of a linear model are constant over time; the alternative hypothesis is that the coefficients change over time due to influence of an external factor. Both methods have been used for change detection in eco-hydrology (de Jong et al, 2012;Verbesselt et al, 2010;Vogl and Lopes, 2010;Webb et al, 2012;de Jong et al, 2013;Verbesselt et al, 2012;Tsutsumida et al, 2013;Forkel et al, 2013), economic analysis (Caporale et al, 2011;Ghosh, 2009;Olmo et al, 2011;Tiwari et al, 2012) and quality control (Saghaei et al, 2009). However, CUSUM is considered to be less sensitive to certain changes in regression coefficients especially if the changes occur in the later dates of the period under consideration (Bauer and Hackl, 1978;Chu et al, 1995).…”
Section: Structural Changes In Monthly Rainfall-streamflow Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The null hypothesis tested by both CUSUM and MOSUM is that regression coefficients of a linear model are constant over time; the alternative hypothesis is that the coefficients change over time due to influence of an external factor. Both methods have been used for change detection in eco-hydrology (de Jong et al, 2012;Verbesselt et al, 2010;Vogl and Lopes, 2010;Webb et al, 2012;de Jong et al, 2013;Verbesselt et al, 2012;Tsutsumida et al, 2013;Forkel et al, 2013), economic analysis (Caporale et al, 2011;Ghosh, 2009;Olmo et al, 2011;Tiwari et al, 2012) and quality control (Saghaei et al, 2009). However, CUSUM is considered to be less sensitive to certain changes in regression coefficients especially if the changes occur in the later dates of the period under consideration (Bauer and Hackl, 1978;Chu et al, 1995).…”
Section: Structural Changes In Monthly Rainfall-streamflow Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noorossana et al (2008) investigated the effect of autocorrelation between linear profiles on the performance of T 2 control chart proposed by Kang and Albin (2000). Saghaei et al (2009) proposed a method based on cumulative sum statistics for monitoring of linear profiles in phase II. Zhang and Wang (2009) constructed control chart based on likelihood ratio for monitoring linear profiles in phase II.…”
Section: Literature Review On Monitoring the Quality Profiles In Phase Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mestek et al (1994), Stover and Brill (1998), Kang and Albin (2000), Kim et al (2003), and Mahmoud and Woodall (2004) are just a few researchers who worked on profile monitoring. In addition, Niaki et al (2007), Saghaei et al (2009), Zhang et al (2009, Zhu and Lin (2010), Noorossana et al (2010), Amiri et al (2011) and Narvand et al (2013) are some researchers who worked on Phase-II profile monitoring. Besides, Du et al (2015a, b) investigated the cascade effects in multistage processes.…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%