2023
DOI: 10.1029/2023gl103979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Customized Multi‐Scale Deep Learning Framework for Storm Nowcasting

Abstract: Storm nowcasting is critical and urgently needed. Recent advances in deep learning (DL) have shown potential for improving nowcasting accuracy and predicting general low‐intensity precipitation events. However, DL models yield poor performance on high‐impact storms due to insufficient extraction and characterization of complex multi‐scale spatiotemporal variations of storms. To tackle this challenge, we propose a novel customized multi‐scale (CM) DL framework, including a flexible attention module capturing sc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…State-of-the-art data-driven precipitation nowcasting approaches take advantage of deep generative models to yield probabilistic forecast. However, these methods (Ravuri et al 2021, Yang andYuan 2023), mostly based on generative adversarial nets (Goodfellow et al 2014), often encounter severe approximation/optimization errors, making it difficult to achieve a probability forecasts. This challenge is evident in the metrics discussed in section 5.2, where DGMR performs relatively worse than the diffusion model in terms of CSI and CRPS scores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…State-of-the-art data-driven precipitation nowcasting approaches take advantage of deep generative models to yield probabilistic forecast. However, these methods (Ravuri et al 2021, Yang andYuan 2023), mostly based on generative adversarial nets (Goodfellow et al 2014), often encounter severe approximation/optimization errors, making it difficult to achieve a probability forecasts. This challenge is evident in the metrics discussed in section 5.2, where DGMR performs relatively worse than the diffusion model in terms of CSI and CRPS scores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%