2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2011.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cusp catastrophe model of withdrawal in construction project dispute negotiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The splitting factor has been variously identified as the emotional involvement in the issue, the strength of the individual preconceptions or the importance of the issue for the individual. Still, even with a number of variables limited to two, because of the continuous nature of the parameters, the application of the catastrophe theory to real life is extremely cumbersome, as shown, for example by [ 68 , 74 – 79 ]. The difficulties arise from the need to precisely measure and assign numerical values to the control variables, which are often of a delicate, psychological nature: information, involvement in the issue, personal importance, emotional factors, and the difficulty of assigning numerical values with high precision.…”
Section: General Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The splitting factor has been variously identified as the emotional involvement in the issue, the strength of the individual preconceptions or the importance of the issue for the individual. Still, even with a number of variables limited to two, because of the continuous nature of the parameters, the application of the catastrophe theory to real life is extremely cumbersome, as shown, for example by [ 68 , 74 – 79 ]. The difficulties arise from the need to precisely measure and assign numerical values to the control variables, which are often of a delicate, psychological nature: information, involvement in the issue, personal importance, emotional factors, and the difficulty of assigning numerical values with high precision.…”
Section: General Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Catastrophe theory is presented by French mathematician THOM in 1972, in THOM's study, the frequently-used model are folding catastrophe, cusp catastrophe, swallowtail catastrophe and butterfly catastrophe [15,16], among which the cusp catastrophe state trend as shown in figure 1. In a certain condition, the system state change smooth, i.e.…”
Section: Rms Reconfiguration Timing Decision Based On Cusp Catastrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires technology transfer from other branches of industry into construction and vice versa, (Skibniewski, Nof 1989;Pan et al 2011;Kaklauskas, Zavadskas 2004) with a thorough technology feasibility evaluation prior to its implementation on construction sites (Gaultney et al 1989;Jiang et al 2012). Much of the current efforts focus on construction innovation aims at the challenges related to environmental sustainability and energy management in the built environment, Zavadskas et al 2008;Turskis et al 2012) safety improvement, (Cheng, Teizer 2011) and productivity enhancement (Chao, Skibniewski 1994;Liao et al 2012;Zavadskas, Vaidogas 2009). This trend, in addition to creativity manifestations in new architectural forms, is likely to continue well into the future, particularly over growing environmental protection concerns and sustainability of the current economic systems in the remainder of the 21st century.…”
Section: Innovation Environment In Construction Technology and Possibmentioning
confidence: 99%