2020
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2019.2913151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Current-Mode Delay-Based Hysteretic Buck Regulator With Enhanced Efficiency at Ultra-Light Loads for Low-Power Microcontrollers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the regulation of AV DD , we are not using the conventional OPDC scheme which requires fast comparators, as the fast comparator increases the controller's power loss and design difficulty, and degrades the regulation robustness as the switching noise would easily affect the comparator operation [14]. Reference [23] explores a currentmode delay based hysteretic control scheme to regulate the single-output DC-DC buck converter, proving the advantages in quiescent current and design complexity by using a slow comparator for regulation. We propose a slow comparator based OPDC (SC-OPDC) scheme with a synchronous circuit.…”
Section: The Proposed Hybrid Sibto Converter Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the regulation of AV DD , we are not using the conventional OPDC scheme which requires fast comparators, as the fast comparator increases the controller's power loss and design difficulty, and degrades the regulation robustness as the switching noise would easily affect the comparator operation [14]. Reference [23] explores a currentmode delay based hysteretic control scheme to regulate the single-output DC-DC buck converter, proving the advantages in quiescent current and design complexity by using a slow comparator for regulation. We propose a slow comparator based OPDC (SC-OPDC) scheme with a synchronous circuit.…”
Section: The Proposed Hybrid Sibto Converter Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 12a, as the switching frequency increases, the coil-wire length, l, and skin depth, δ, both decrease. Based on calculations, since the effect of coil-wire length reduction According to Figures 11b and 12b, the efficiency boundaries of PSiPs are predicted and verified in Figure 13 [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61]. In order to eliminate the effect of input and output voltages on efficiency, the efficiencies in the literature are normalized according to the following:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%