2001
DOI: 10.1109/61.956726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A current-based solution for transformer differential protection. I. Problem statement

Abstract: This paper analyzes the problem of transformer differential protection. First, we review the concept of transformer differential protection. We then analyze magnetizing inrush, overexcitation, and current transformer (CT) saturation phenomena as possible causes of relay misoperation. Finally, we summarize the existing methods for discriminating internal faults from inrush and overexcitation conditions. In Part II of the paper, we propose a new approach for transformer differential protection and describe the r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to ensure the reliability of the method, the current transformer saturation was also concerned in all of investigated cases. It was found that through several cases examined, the time to CT saturation often took about one cycle or longer [21,22], the influences of CT saturation was thus rarely observed. From scenarios considered in this study, although the currents may not always be a well-defined profile, the proposed method was confirmed to serve as an auxiliary alternative for transformer overcurrent recognition in addition to existing approaches.…”
Section: Measured Fault Currentmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In order to ensure the reliability of the method, the current transformer saturation was also concerned in all of investigated cases. It was found that through several cases examined, the time to CT saturation often took about one cycle or longer [21,22], the influences of CT saturation was thus rarely observed. From scenarios considered in this study, although the currents may not always be a well-defined profile, the proposed method was confirmed to serve as an auxiliary alternative for transformer overcurrent recognition in addition to existing approaches.…”
Section: Measured Fault Currentmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The fault current has a higher slope first and then its slope decreases so a fault current behaves as a flat-toped wave. These differences originate from the different cases and nature of fault and inrush currents and are consistent for different transformer and power system parameters [1].…”
Section: Different Behaviors Of Fault and Inrush Currentmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These systems require small fault clearing time to protect the equipments and to guarantee the system stability when short circuit occurs. In some possible conditions, the conventional algorithms such as those based on the principle of the second harmonic, cannot respond in the due time or may incorrectly respond to the transformer inrush current [1]. Therefore, researchers have been motivated to develop more secure differential protection algorithms in order to improve the operation speed and also to improve the reliability by distinguishing the transformer internal faults from short circuit fault.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional approach uses the principle of the second harmonic restraint [5]. The main drawback of the method is that the possible harmonic in the internal fault current can cause differential relay either not to operate or to operate with a long delay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%