2017
DOI: 10.1080/14631369.2017.1307688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A curious trajectory of interrace relations: the transformation of cosmopolitan Malay port polities into the multiethnic divisions of modern Malaysia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The former has left its imprint through the influence of three different foreign powers, Portugal (1511−1641), the Netherlands (1641−1795), and Great Britain (1795−1957) which controlled the territory of present Malaysia in succession. While the identities of different groups such as the Peranakan (Straits‐born) Chinese and the Kristang (community of mixed Portuguese and Malay descent) were characterized by fluidity and hybridity in the pre‐colonial period, this changed fundamentally during the British colonial era when ethnic segregation was used as an instrument of colonial control (Petrů, 2018). During the colonial period, ethnic groups were ‘physically and socially segregated’ (Hirschman, 1986: 353), a circumstance related to the recruitment of large numbers of Indian and Chinese workers to boost the economy.…”
Section: Ethnic Politics In Malaysiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The former has left its imprint through the influence of three different foreign powers, Portugal (1511−1641), the Netherlands (1641−1795), and Great Britain (1795−1957) which controlled the territory of present Malaysia in succession. While the identities of different groups such as the Peranakan (Straits‐born) Chinese and the Kristang (community of mixed Portuguese and Malay descent) were characterized by fluidity and hybridity in the pre‐colonial period, this changed fundamentally during the British colonial era when ethnic segregation was used as an instrument of colonial control (Petrů, 2018). During the colonial period, ethnic groups were ‘physically and socially segregated’ (Hirschman, 1986: 353), a circumstance related to the recruitment of large numbers of Indian and Chinese workers to boost the economy.…”
Section: Ethnic Politics In Malaysiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many Malays were employed in the British colonial administration (Petrů, 2018: 66−70). Some Malay leaders who had enjoyed British education and shared British values were even seen as arrows into the future.…”
Section: Ethnic Politics In Malaysiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Malay students attend the national school, whereas the Chinese and Indians go to their Chinese school and Indian school, respectively. Thus, the students are denied the opportunity to know and mingle with each other at their tender age (Haque, 2003; Petru, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ethnic groups are Malays, Indigenous people, and natives of Sabah and Sarawak (69.3%), Chinese (22.8%), and Indians (6.9%), while the remaining 1% is formed by other ethnic groups. Resulting from its historical process, favouritism for linguistic plurality has been created and resulted in ethnic mixing and cultural hybridisation in Malaysia (Petrů, 2017). The prioritising of Malays and other Indigenous people in the country's policy has been harmful influence in interethnic relations and a hindrance for social and economic progress.…”
Section: Context Of Malaysiamentioning
confidence: 99%