2012
DOI: 10.5172/jfs.2012.3018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cultural Assessment of Family Dispute Resolution: Findings about Cultural Appropriateness from the Evaluation of a Family Relationship Centre

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, much of the research on FDR use has focused on service provision and practice (e.g., Smyth et al, ), with studies of the experiences of FDR clients often restricting attention to specific segments of clients, such as those with culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds (Akin Ojelabi et al, ; Armstrong, ). Where samples are derived from the FDR service clientele of separated parents, it is not possible identify the extent to which the characteristics and circumstances of such clients differ from those who have not used FDR.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, much of the research on FDR use has focused on service provision and practice (e.g., Smyth et al, ), with studies of the experiences of FDR clients often restricting attention to specific segments of clients, such as those with culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds (Akin Ojelabi et al, ; Armstrong, ). Where samples are derived from the FDR service clientele of separated parents, it is not possible identify the extent to which the characteristics and circumstances of such clients differ from those who have not used FDR.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In relation to training on the second fundamental aspect of substantive knowledge, for family group ADR variants "core philosophical assumptions and practice expectations" need to be incorporated (Chandler & Giovannucci, 2004:221). From a review of the literature, the following emerge as essential in training programmes for all methods of child protection ADR: knowledge of family dynamics and family systems theory (Association of Family and Conciliation Courts Guidelines, 2012;Hehr, 2007;Mayer, 2009;Savoury, Beals & Parks, 1995); roles of parties and participants (Association of Family and Conciliation Courts Guidelines, 2012;California Rules of Court, 2014); how individualistic approaches to dispute resolution are different from collective approaches (Boniface, 2012;Ojelabi, Fisher, Cleak, Vernon & Balvin, 2012); child protection legislation and system (Association of Family and Conciliation Courts Guidelines, 2012;Mayer, 2009); the legal framework for child protection intervention (Association of Family and Conciliation Courts Guidelines, 2012;Cunningham & Van Leeuwen, 2005;Mayer, 2009); court process (Association of Family and Conciliation Courts Guidelines, 2012); issues related to intervention in child abuse and neglect (Association of Family and Conciliation Courts Guidelines, 2012;California Rules of Court, 2014;Mayer, 2009); typical impact of family violence, substance abuse, mental health issues (Association of Family and Conciliation Courts Guidelines, 2012;California Rules of Court, 2014;Mayer, 2009;Savoury et al, 1995); child development, attachment, psychological issues (Association of Family and Conciliation Courts Guidelines, 2012); Chandler & Giovannucci, 2004;Mayer, 2009; diversity issues, cultural assessment (Association of Family and Conciliation Courts Guidelines, 2012;California Rules of Court, 2014;Giovannucci & Largent, 2009;…”
Section: Content Of Training Programmesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She concludes that an "intra-cultural model of mediation" should be developed in South Africa (Boniface, 2012:124). Generally, indigenous methods will require specialist knowledge training in, for example, attitudes of family members to community elders (Ojelabi et al, 2012).…”
Section: Content Of Training Programmesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation