2005
DOI: 10.1080/12265080500117541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cultural Analysis of South Korea's Economic Prospects

Abstract: This study analyses cultural effects on economic development in South Korea. It introduces the concept of transaction costs as an operational intermediary between culture and economic development. Using this approach, it is found that culture affects economic development through its impacts on transaction costs in the static case. In the dynamic case, culture affects the economy through its impacts on the creative capacity of citizens. To assess the role of culture in future economic development, recent change… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis identifies several features unique to the Korean context, which significantly influence the discourse on digital transformation on Korean social media platforms. For instance, Korea's collectivist cultural norms shape the adoption of technologies that emphasize communal benefits and organizational harmony [64]. Additionally, the country's leading position in digital transformation fosters a progressive environment for discussing advanced digital infrastructure [65].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis identifies several features unique to the Korean context, which significantly influence the discourse on digital transformation on Korean social media platforms. For instance, Korea's collectivist cultural norms shape the adoption of technologies that emphasize communal benefits and organizational harmony [64]. Additionally, the country's leading position in digital transformation fosters a progressive environment for discussing advanced digital infrastructure [65].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%