2015
DOI: 10.1142/s2251171715500075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A CubeSat for Calibrating Ground-Based and Sub-Orbital Millimeter-Wave Polarimeters (CalSat)

Abstract: We describe a low-cost, open-access, CubeSat-based calibration instrument that is designed to support ground-based and sub-orbital experiments searching for various polarization signals in the cosmic microwave background (CMB). All modern CMB polarization experiments require a robust calibration program that will allow the effects of instrument-induced signals to be mitigated during data analysis. A bright, compact and linearly polarized astrophysical source with polarization properties known to adequate preci… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…et al 2014). At millimetre wavelengths, the best celestial source appears to be Tau A, though it is not ideal because (i) it is not bright enough to give a high signal-to-noise ratio measurement with a short integration time, (ii) the source is extended with a complicated polarisation intensity morphology, (iii) the millimetre-wave spectrum of Tau A is not precisely known, which is important for polarimeters that have frequency-dependent performance, and (iv) Tau A is not observable from Antarctica where many ground-based and balloon-borne experiments are sited (see Johnson et al (2015) and references therein). Since an ideal celestial calibration source does not exist, many current experiments (Kaufman et al 2014;Barkats et al 2014;Naess et al 2014; The Polarbear Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade et al 2014;BICEP2 Collaboration et al 2015a) use a 'self-calibration' method (Keating et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…et al 2014). At millimetre wavelengths, the best celestial source appears to be Tau A, though it is not ideal because (i) it is not bright enough to give a high signal-to-noise ratio measurement with a short integration time, (ii) the source is extended with a complicated polarisation intensity morphology, (iii) the millimetre-wave spectrum of Tau A is not precisely known, which is important for polarimeters that have frequency-dependent performance, and (iv) Tau A is not observable from Antarctica where many ground-based and balloon-borne experiments are sited (see Johnson et al (2015) and references therein). Since an ideal celestial calibration source does not exist, many current experiments (Kaufman et al 2014;Barkats et al 2014;Naess et al 2014; The Polarbear Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade et al 2014;BICEP2 Collaboration et al 2015a) use a 'self-calibration' method (Keating et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the grid-angle systematic can be determined by fitting for a rotation angle from the TB and EB power spectra and correcting the transfer function similar to the self-calibration procedure of Keating et al (2013). This would preclude a measurement of isotropic cosmic birefringence, so a hardware calibration system (Johnson et al 2015) would likely be implemented. We have shown that the temperature to polarization leakage due to VPM emission can be mitigated by removing a template from the TOD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The polarized sources can be mounted on a tripod, tower, drone, weather balloon, or a CubeSat. 34,35 The distance to the telescope far field and the telescope elevation range determines which mounting options are available. For the SO SATs, the far field ranges from ∼ 30 m to ∼ 300 m depending on the observation frequency, which is within the range of a tripod-, tower-, or dronemounted polarizaton calibrator.…”
Section: Available Calibration Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%