2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10601-007-9016-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A CSP Search Algorithm with Responsibility Sets and Kernels

Abstract: A CSP search algorithm, like FC or MAC, explores a search tree during its run. Every node of the search tree can be associated with a CSP created by the refined domains of unassigned variables. If the algorithm detects that the CSP associated with a node is insoluble, the node becomes a dead-end. A strategy of pruning "by analogy" states that the current node of the search tree can be discarded if the CSP associated with it is "more constrained" than a CSP associated with some dead-end node. In this paper we p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it is related to approaches that eliminate redundancies by posting constraints (for SAT) [21,14] or decomposing problems [13], this way of reasoning has been developed so as to yield a hierarchy of increasingly stronger consistencies. For binary constraint networks, failed values basically permit us to identify and exploit a form of nogood in the same spirit as generalized nogood in [15], global cut seed in [9], kernel [22] and partial state [18]. We believe that identifying common properties to these different approaches is an exciting perspective.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is related to approaches that eliminate redundancies by posting constraints (for SAT) [21,14] or decomposing problems [13], this way of reasoning has been developed so as to yield a hierarchy of increasingly stronger consistencies. For binary constraint networks, failed values basically permit us to identify and exploit a form of nogood in the same spirit as generalized nogood in [15], global cut seed in [9], kernel [22] and partial state [18]. We believe that identifying common properties to these different approaches is an exciting perspective.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%