2011
DOI: 10.1007/s12325-010-0098-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A crossover study of rosuvastatin and pitavastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes

Abstract: Therapy with both statins improved lipid profiles and reduced proinflammatory responses; however, 2.5 mg of ROS have a potent LDL-C-lowering and hsCRP-lowering effect compared with 2 mg of PIT in patients with diabetes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
2
Order By: Relevance
“…26,27 It was concluded, however, that conventional statin therapy should not be changed, because the benefits for prevention of cardiovascular events overweigh the glucose metabolism-related risks. 26,27 In Japan, no conclusion has been drawn regarding the effect of statins on glucose metabolism in the clinical setting, 28,29 but HbA 1c was not significantly affected after long-term (6-month) treatment with rosuvastatin in the present study. Given the benefits of statins for prevention of cardiovascular events, it may be crucial to continue statin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidaemia, while monitoring glucose metabolism-related parameters, including HbA 1c .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…26,27 It was concluded, however, that conventional statin therapy should not be changed, because the benefits for prevention of cardiovascular events overweigh the glucose metabolism-related risks. 26,27 In Japan, no conclusion has been drawn regarding the effect of statins on glucose metabolism in the clinical setting, 28,29 but HbA 1c was not significantly affected after long-term (6-month) treatment with rosuvastatin in the present study. Given the benefits of statins for prevention of cardiovascular events, it may be crucial to continue statin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidaemia, while monitoring glucose metabolism-related parameters, including HbA 1c .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…38 A significantly greater decrease in serum LDL-C levels from the baseline occurred with rosuvastatin (−44.1%) than with pitavastatin (−36.9%, P , 0.01) in the rosuvastatin-pitavastatin group, and a significantly greater decrease with rosuvastatin (−44.7%) than with pitavastatin (−34.8%, P , 0.01) in the pitavastatin-rosuvastatin group. A significant reduction in serum LDL-C levels from the baseline was also observed with rosuvastatin (−44.6% at 12 weeks and −5.5% at 24 weeks) in the rosuvastatinrosuvastatin group and there were no significant differences between data at 12, and 24 weeks.…”
Section: Pitavastatin Vs Rosuvastatinmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…[24][25][26][27] Compared to other previously commercialized statins, pitavastatin proved to be as effective as atorvastatin in terms of the proportions of patients achieving the LDL-C goal, reductions in LDL-C, TC, and Tg, [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] but to be inferior to rosuvastatin in lowering LDL-C, and hs-CRP in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, 38 placing between atorvastatin and rosuvastatin in terms of effectiveness (Table 3). Moreover, compared to other statins, pitavastatin treatment was also associated with a significant greater increase in HDL-C levels ( Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatedly, we also found hyperlipidemia to be associated with Charcot foot. Treatment of CAD with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMGCoA) reductase inhibitors (i.e., “statins”) has also been described to have an anti-inflammatory effect [33, 34]. CAD has not been described in prior Charcot foot multivariate models [4, 5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%