1996
DOI: 10.1378/chest.109.6.1477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Crossover Study Comparing the Efficacy of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure With Anterior Mandibular Positioning Devices on Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
109
0
15

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
109
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…[16][17][18][19] Two of these compared the use of a mandibular advancement splint with nasal CPAP 16,17 and concluded that the MAS achieved substantial success (45% reduction in AHI score), but were less effective …”
Section: Rationale For the Use Of Mandibular Advancement Splintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18][19] Two of these compared the use of a mandibular advancement splint with nasal CPAP 16,17 and concluded that the MAS achieved substantial success (45% reduction in AHI score), but were less effective …”
Section: Rationale For the Use Of Mandibular Advancement Splintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10][11][12][13] Existing research demonstrates that OA therapy is superior to commonly offered surgical procedures, 8,9 and may be comparable to CPAP when adherence is included in the defi nition of successful treatment. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] In 2006, the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) published updated OSA treatment guidelines which state that OAs are a reasonable alternative to CPAP in patients with mild to moderate OSA who prefer these devices or do not tolerate CPAP. 5 Mandibular advancement devices provide a therapeutic effect by protruding the mandible relative to the maxilla, simultaneously advancing the tongue and reducing the propensity for airway collapse during sleep.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although randomized cross-over studies indicate that CPAP is more efficacious than OA's, generally patients prefer OA's to CPAP therapy. 19 The use of OA's are indicated for patients who have mild to moderate OSA. 17 Our severe OSA patient however was intolerant to both CPAP and OA therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%