A cross‐sectorial review of industrial best practices and case histories on Industry 4.0 technologies

Galizia, Francesco Gabriele; Bortolini, Marco; Calabrese, Francesca

doi:10.1002/sys.21697

Cited by 6 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 86 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“… Additive manufacturing -3D printing or scanning (Bigliardi et al, 2020;Galizia et al, 2023;Semeraro et al, 2023); predictive manufacturing (Tubis & Grzybowska, 2022);…”

Section: Literature Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… Advanced manufacturing solutions -smart sensors (Bigliardi et al, 2020;Galizia et al, 2023), robots, and machine-to-machine communication technologies Semeraro et al, 2023;Tobon-Valencia et al, 2022), smart factory (Karuppiah et al, 2022);…”

Section: Literature Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…17th International Scientific Conference INPROFORUM Challenges and Opportunities in the Digital World, November 2 -3, 2023, České Budějovice  Augmented reality (Bigliardi et al, 2020;Galizia et al, 2023;Karuppiah et al, 2022;Semeraro et al, 2023;Tubis & Grzybowska, 2022);…”

Section: Literature Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… Big data -analysis of data (Bigliardi et al, 2020;Galizia et al, 2023;Karuppiah et al, 2022;Semeraro et al, 2023;Tobon-Valencia et al, 2022);…”

Section: Literature Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… Cloud (Bigliardi et al, 2020;Galizia et al, 2023;Semeraro et al, 2023;Tobon-Valencia et al, 2022;Tubis & Grzybowska, 2022);…”

Section: Literature Overviewunclassified

See 4 more Smart Citations

Industry 4.0 and technologies used in SMEs

Klarner,

Řehoř

Proceedings of the 17th International Scientific Conference INPROFORUM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Innovation is becoming an increasingly essential part of business. Modern technologies are increasingly penetrating everyday life, not just the business sphere. Without the implementation of new technologies, many companies will cease to exist. At best, they will lag far behind the competition. We can already see different levels of use of new technologies across individual businesses. The question also remains how to finance and subsequently evaluate these significant investments. This contribution aims to determine which technologies are most used in small and medium-sized organizations and how their choice is influenced. Attention is also paid to the reasons behind using technologies related to Industry 4.0. Data for this research were collected using an online questionnaire survey. It has been found that digitalization and cloud storage technologies are the most widely used in absolute terms. On the other hand, technologies such as Machine learning, Big data, or Virtual reality are used to a minimal extent. It has also been observed that the organization's vision is the main reason for implementing these technologies.

show abstract

“… Additive manufacturing -3D printing or scanning (Bigliardi et al, 2020;Galizia et al, 2023;Semeraro et al, 2023); predictive manufacturing (Tubis & Grzybowska, 2022);…”

Section: Literature Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… Big data -analysis of data (Bigliardi et al, 2020;Galizia et al, 2023;Karuppiah et al, 2022;Semeraro et al, 2023;Tobon-Valencia et al, 2022);…”

Section: Literature Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… Cloud (Bigliardi et al, 2020;Galizia et al, 2023;Semeraro et al, 2023;Tobon-Valencia et al, 2022;Tubis & Grzybowska, 2022);…”

Section: Literature Overviewunclassified

See 3 more Smart Citations

Industry 4.0 and technologies used in SMEs

Klarner,

Řehoř

Proceedings of the 17th International Scientific Conference INPROFORUM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Team and communication impacts of remote work for complex aerospace system development

Ferguson,

van Velzen,

Olechowski

2023

Systems Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Remote work is becoming increasingly common, a trend accelerated by the global COVID‐19 pandemic. Existing remote work research fails to address the challenges and needs of engineers working remotely in Complex Aerospace System Development (CASD), the field responsible for creating and operating aerospace systems. This article presents an exploratory study to understand the challenges, benefits, and strategies when working remotely in CASD. We interviewed 12 CASD engineers working remotely at a major aerospace corporation. We ground our findings in six characteristics of CASD work (complex systems; design paths and feedback loops; relationships with suppliers, customers and regulators; distinct knowledge and skills; one‐off innovation; and high cost of experimentation) and discuss how each of these characteristics challenges remote work. The findings show that CASD requires many teams to work together, and this is encouraged through informal communication, which almost disappears in a remote setting. CASD requires frequent feedback, and we found that feedback was slow when working remotely. Participants found it challenging to demonstrate systems to customers and verify drawings with suppliers, and the interpersonal relationships, which help to bridge disciplinary divides, were harder to maintain remotely. The one‐off nature of the systems designed meant that conceptual work was important, but participants lacked the virtual tools to do this effectively. Lastly, testing hardware components required close virtual communication between technicians and engineers, which was tricky in a detail‐oriented context. This study motivates areas for future work to better understand and address the nuances of remote work by engineers in CASD.

show abstract