1990
DOI: 10.1080/03014469000000962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cross-sectional survey of upper and lower limb strength in boys and girls during childhood and adolescence

Abstract: Changes in height and weight during childhood and adolescence are well documented, yet there is comparatively little comprehensive information about muscular development during this time. In a cross-sectional survey standing height, body weight and isometric strength of the elbow flexor and quadriceps muscles have been measured in 267 boys and 284 girls aged from 5 to 17 years. All the children were from private London schools. The mean heights and weights for each age group were between the 50th and 75th cent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
82
1
6

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
10
82
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Females also have lower correlations among all asymmetries compared with males, both within and between elements. The greater male asymmetry in humeral diaphyseal breadths could be a result of generally greater mechanical loadings on the upper limb bones in males, related to greater muscular development during adolescence (Parker et al, 1990;Round et al, 1999) or possibly to more marked asymmetry in upper-limb-use among males (on average). Behavioral evidence for sex differences in upper limb preference are mixed, and potentially confounded by cultural factors (Perelle and Ehrman, 1994;Raymond and Pontier, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Females also have lower correlations among all asymmetries compared with males, both within and between elements. The greater male asymmetry in humeral diaphyseal breadths could be a result of generally greater mechanical loadings on the upper limb bones in males, related to greater muscular development during adolescence (Parker et al, 1990;Round et al, 1999) or possibly to more marked asymmetry in upper-limb-use among males (on average). Behavioral evidence for sex differences in upper limb preference are mixed, and potentially confounded by cultural factors (Perelle and Ehrman, 1994;Raymond and Pontier, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…73 Standardised antigravity limb positions and placement of the myometer head were used to test each muscle group. [73][74][75] Three maximal contractions were performed for each muscle group and the highest strength measurement was recorded for analysis…”
Section: Muscle Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baseline measurements were taken on three occasions, each 1 week apart, and twice post-training, 3 days apart. The primary strength measure was unilateral isometric leg extension strength at a joint angle of 1.57 rad assessed with a conventional strength-testing chair (Parker et al 1990). For the three baseline tests this measure had a coefficient of variation of 3.5%.…”
Section: Strength Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%