A Cross‐sectional Survey of the Clinical and Psychological Features of Low Back Pain and Consequent Work Handicap: Use of the Quebec Task Force Classification

Abstract

SUMMARYA hospital‐based cross‐sectional study examined 657 consecutive referrals with low back pain over two years to a district rheumatology service serving a population of about 250,000 people. Five hundred and thirty‐eight had mechanical/degenerative low back pain. The mean age was 48.6 (range 18–80 SD 15.3) years; 64% were women. Patients with radiating pain or neurological deficit (Quebec Task Force classification) were significantly more disabled (Roland disability score p<0.001) and depressed (Modified Zung score p<0.05) than those without radiating pain. Women were more impaired (p=0.02) than men but had similar disabilities (mean Roland score 11.7, range 0–24 SD 6.5). Fifty‐three per cent of patients were receiving benefits and were significantly more likely to have musculoskeletal comorbidities than those in work (p<0.025). It is concluded that the Quebec Task Force classification of low back pain impairment is a helpful descriptor and related to both physical and psychological disability and handicap in employment.

Individuals with musculoskeletal conditions awaiting orthopaedic surgery consultation: an untapped opportunity for patient health management?

“…4 Up to 18 in every 100 individuals with musculoskeletal conditions are referred to orthopaedic specialists. 5 Waiting periods for specialist care can be months or years for this group who are at risk of poor health 6,7 , so it is essential to understand their ongoing health needs.…”

Chronic pain management focuses on the individual, not on the pain

“…As a retired spinal pain physician, whose patients with low back pain had a mean episode duration of 2.5 years and those with neck pain had a mean episode duration of pain of 1.3 years, I welcome the review by Kang and colleagues 123. These studies confirm the considerable extent of both spinal and extraspinal comorbidity, sleep disturbance, and psychological distress that Kang and colleagues mention 23. I also recognise the “heartsink” patients who have usually seen many consultant colleagues for a wide variety of complaints and those with hypersensitivity.…”