2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijms232315407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cross-Sectional Study on the Occurrence of the Intestinal Protist, Dientamoeba fragilis, in the Gut-Healthy Volunteers and Their Animals

Abstract: Dientamoeba fragilis is a cosmopolitan intestinal protist colonizing the human gut with varying prevalence depending on the cohort studied and the diagnostic methods used. Its role in human health remains unclear mainly due to the very sporadic number of cross-sectional studies in gut-healthy populations. The main objective of this study was to expand knowledge of the epidemiology of D. fragilis in gut-healthy humans and their animals. A total of 296 stool samples from humans and 135 samples from 18 animal spe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The role of co-infection is unclear, but it is hypothesized that D. fragilis is transmitted via the fecal-oral route and may be associated with travel and animal contact [ 57 ]. It has also been noted that co-infection of these two intestinal parasites has a prevalence ranging from ~18 to 34% in patients with gastrointestinal symptoms [ 58 ]. In the present study, co-infection of Blastocystis spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of co-infection is unclear, but it is hypothesized that D. fragilis is transmitted via the fecal-oral route and may be associated with travel and animal contact [ 57 ]. It has also been noted that co-infection of these two intestinal parasites has a prevalence ranging from ~18 to 34% in patients with gastrointestinal symptoms [ 58 ]. In the present study, co-infection of Blastocystis spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the accurate detection of intestinal protists and the assessment of their prevalence in gut-healthy individuals, the utilization of a precise and highly sensitive molecular method is imperative e.g. [ 29 , 30 ]. This choice becomes particularly crucial in the case of Giardia , given the sensitivity and specificity challenges associated with existing molecular targeting protocols [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of intestinal protists is influenced by various epidemiological factors such as living locality, contact with animals, travel history, age, and gender [ 21 , 30 ]. Among these factors, only contact with animals significantly impacted Giardia occurrence in gut-healthy individuals in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other protozoa frequently found but with controversial pathogenicity are Dientamoeba fragilis and Blastocystis spp. Dientamoeba fragilis has been selectively reported in developed countries ranging from to 0.2 to 82%, this variability depends on the geographical area, population group, study design and diagnostic procedures [12][13][14]. Blastocystis spp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%