A cross-sectional study on health differences between rural and non-rural U.S. counties using the County Health Rankings

Abstract

BackgroundBy examining 2013 County Health Rankings and Roadmaps data from the University of Wisconsin and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, this paper seeks to add to the available literature on health variances between United States residents living in rural and non-rural areas. We believe this is the first study to use the Rankings data to measure rural and urban health differences across the United States and therefore highlights the national need to address shortfalls in rural healthcare and overall health. The data indicates that U.S. residents living in rural counties are generally in poorer health than their urban counterparts.MethodsWe used 2013 County Health Rankings data to evaluate differences across the six domains of interest (mortality, morbidity, health behaviors, clinical care, social and economic factors, and physical environment) for rural and non-rural U.S. counties. This is a cross-sectional study employing chi-square analysis and logit regression.ResultsWe found that residents living in rural U.S. counties are more likely to have poorer health outcomes along a variety of measurements that comprise the County Health Rankings’ indexed domains of health quality. These populations have statistically significantly (p ≤ 0.05) lower scores in such areas as health behavior, morbidity factors, clinical care, and the physical environment. We attribute the differences to a variety of factors including limitations in infrastructure, socioeconomic differences, insurance coverage deficiencies, and higher rates of traffic fatalities and accidents.DiscussionsThe largest differences between rural and non-rural counties were in the indexed domains of mortality and clinical care.ConclusionsOur analysis revealed differences in health outcomes in the County Health Rankings’ indexed domains between rural and non-rural U.S. counties. We also describe limitations and offer commentary on the need for more uniform measurements in the classification of the terms rural and non-rural. These results can influence practitioners and policy makers in guiding future research and when deciding on funding allocation.

Rural‐urban disparities in health care costs and health service utilization following pediatric mild traumatic brain injury

“…While these studies reveal the magnitude of health care expenditures associated with mTBI, the burden and distribution of health care costs across specific outpatient services and among various patient groups has yet to be determined. Health care costs associated with mTBI for rural patients are of particular interest due to evidence of lower quality clinical care and worse socioeconomic conditions for rural compared to urban residents . Given burgeoning concerns about the prevalence and potential ramifications of mTBI, it is critical to understand the barriers to optimizing recovery among children and adolescents in rural and urban settings.…”

Rural‐Urban Differences in Medicare Quality Scores Persist After Adjusting for Sociodemographic and Environmental Characteristics

“…We adjusted for several county‐level sociodemographic and environmental characteristics in our analyses, similar to prior studies . In choosing characteristics to include, we focused on health factors from domains that are known to influence population health: health behaviors, social/economic characteristics, and physical environment .…”

Bringing Produce to the People: Implementing a Social Marketing Food Access Intervention in Rural Food Deserts

“…The nature of rural areas – sparsely populated, having minimal development and commercial areas – means that some of these interventions are not transferrable to rural settings. 1,9 For example, larger chain stores often select areas based on their potential for profitability and where insurance and security costs are low; rural areas do not typically meet those criteria. 10 Innovative strategies are needed to increase access to nutritious foods in rural areas.…”