2011
DOI: 10.4304/jltr.2.4.790-803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cross-sectional Study of Iranian EFL Learners' Request Strategies

Abstract: This study was a cross-sectional investigation into the request strategies used by Iranian learners of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) and Australian native speakers of English. The sample involved 96 B.A. and M.A. Iranian EFL learners and 10 native speakers of English. A Discourse Completion Test (DCT) was used to generate data related to the request strategies used by each group. The selection of request situations in the DCT was based on 2 social factors of relative power and social distance. Although t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Communication breakdowns may happen if the learners are not knowledgeable of social, cultural, and discourse aspects in different situations bound with the language they produce. Mostly, research in interlanguage pragmatic (ILP) compared between English native speakers (NS) and non-native speakers (NNS) in realizing the speech act strategies when they use the language (Matsumura, 2003;Schauer, 2006;Felix-Brasdefer, 2007;Grossi, 2009;Jalilifar, Hashemian, & Tabatabaee, 2011). Since Kasper and Schmidt (1996) argue that ILP has notably involved within the larger body of Second Language Acquisition (SLA) studies, it starts attracting researchers to examine the effects of instruction on ILP development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Communication breakdowns may happen if the learners are not knowledgeable of social, cultural, and discourse aspects in different situations bound with the language they produce. Mostly, research in interlanguage pragmatic (ILP) compared between English native speakers (NS) and non-native speakers (NNS) in realizing the speech act strategies when they use the language (Matsumura, 2003;Schauer, 2006;Felix-Brasdefer, 2007;Grossi, 2009;Jalilifar, Hashemian, & Tabatabaee, 2011). Since Kasper and Schmidt (1996) argue that ILP has notably involved within the larger body of Second Language Acquisition (SLA) studies, it starts attracting researchers to examine the effects of instruction on ILP development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a comparative cross-cultural study, the request strategies of 96 Iranian EFL learners were compared with those of 10 Australian native speakers of English. The results demonstrated that while native speakers were balanced in their use of direct or indirect request strategies, Iranian EFL learners with lower linguistic proficiency overused direct strategies and underused the indirect ones and those with higher linguistic proficiency overused indirect strategies and underused the direct ones (Jalilifar, Hashemian & Tabatabaee, 2011). Ahangari and Shoghli's (2011) investigation of request strategies in a comparative study of Iranian EFL learners and Canadians demonstrated that both groups used conventionally indirect strategies realized through query-preparatory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrarily, related to the cultural hierarchic model, Chinese learners were competent in the realization of their partners' social power and they could produce appropriate language consequently. Jalilifar et al (2011) conducted a cross-cultural study on differences between the Iranian EFL learners' and Australian native speakers' use of request strategies. It was found that there was a relationship between the learners' proficiency level and the use of indirect request strategies like native speakers.…”
Section: Social Power Distance and Ranking Of Impositionsmentioning
confidence: 99%