A cross-sectional study of experienced coercion in adolescent mental health inpatients

Abstract

BackgroundInvoluntary care and coercive measures are frequently present in mental healthcare for adolescents. The purpose of this study was to examine to what extent adolescents perceive or experience coercion during inpatient mental health care, and to examine predictors of experienced coercion.MethodsA cross-sectional sample of 96 adolescent inpatients from 10 Norwegian acute and combined (acute and sub-acute) psychiatric wards reported their experienced coercion on Coercion Ladder and the Experienced Coercion Scale in questionnaires. Staff reported use of formal coercion, diagnoses, and psychosocial functioning. We used two tailed t-tests and mixed effects models to analyze the impact from demographics, alliance with parents, use of formal coercion, diagnostic condition, and global psychosocial functioning.ResultsHigh experienced coercion was reported by a third of all patients. In a mixed effects model, being under formal coercion (involuntary admission and / or coercive measures); a worse relationship between patient and parent; and lower psychosocial functioning, significantly predicted higher experienced coercion. Twenty-eight percent of the total sample of patients reported a lack of confidence and trust both in parents and staff.ConclusionsRoughly one third of patients in the sample reported high experienced coercion. Being under formal coercion was the strongest predictor. The average scores of experienced coercion in subgroups are comparable with adult scores in similar care situations. There was one exception: Adolescents with psychosis reported low experienced coercion and almost all of them were under voluntary care.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3208-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Involuntary Youth Transport (IYT) to Treatment Programs: Best Practices, Research, Ethics, and Future Directions

“…While more research is needed, these findings support the reasoning that whether or not IYT is perceived as a negative experience depends not only on physical and emotional safety, but also on other contextual factors, such as voice and negative pressures (2021). This reasoning is also consistent with previous findings in the adult and adolescent psychiatric literature on involuntary admissions and perceived coercion (Hoge et al, 2001;Nyttingnes et al, 2018;O'Donoghue et al, 2014;Opsal et al, 2016;Winick, 2008).…”

Perceived Coercion Among Patients Admitted in Psychiatric Wards: Italian Results of the EUNOMIA Study

“…Not surprisingly, several studies (18, 19, 20) have shown that involuntarily admitted patients perceive higher levels of coercion compared to those voluntarily admitted. However, perceived coercion is only partially related to the formal status of admission, and it is confounded by several socio-demographic and clinical variables, including age, ethnicity (perceived coercion is higher in non-white populations), diagnosis, insight of the illness and severity of symptoms (10, 21, 22).…”

Safety in Residential Youth Facilities: Staff Perceptions of Safety and Experiences of the “Basic Training Program in Safety and Security”

“…According to interviews with staff members working within a child and adolescent psychiatric inpatient unit, episodes of physical aggression were common and linked to problems with work attendance and other professional, as well as emotional, sequelae (Dean et al, 2010). These issues may create physical and mental health complications, increased stress levels, lower work satisfaction, lack of safety, anxiety, distress, fear, anger, and hostility, as well as power struggles between staff and youth (Lombart et al, 2020;Miller, 1986;Nyttingnes et al, 2018;Smith et al, 2017;Steckley, 2018;Woodcock & Fisher, 2008). Y.…”