2023
DOI: 10.1111/jan.15801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cross‐sectional study of discipline‐based self‐perceived digital literacy competencies of nursing students

Konstantina Martzoukou,
Errol Sadullah Luders,
Jane Mair
et al.

Abstract: AimsThis study offers an empirical exploration of self‐assessed digital competencies of students, most of whom studied in nursing courses, using a discipline‐based self‐assessment survey tool. A range of digital competencies were explored: information and communication technology proficiency and productivity, information literacy, digital creation, digital research, digital communication, digital learning and development, digital innovation, digital identity management and digital well‐being.DesignA cross‐sect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was noted that senior students demonstrated higher perceived and actual abilities to nd and evaluate electronic health information (eHealth literacy), compared to junior students, possibly due to the higher academic experiences of senior students [28,29]. However, students still required extra support in domain activities such as organizing and evaluating information, understanding academic integrity issues, sharing information online, discerning between high-and low-quality resources, and referencing, despite intermediate competence levels [29][30][31]. The higher competence levels in information literacy skills among students in year level two to year four in this study, may be a result of teaching nursing-speci c skills in Research modules, such as evaluating reliable information and data, peer-reviewing, searching guidelines, and actionable information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was noted that senior students demonstrated higher perceived and actual abilities to nd and evaluate electronic health information (eHealth literacy), compared to junior students, possibly due to the higher academic experiences of senior students [28,29]. However, students still required extra support in domain activities such as organizing and evaluating information, understanding academic integrity issues, sharing information online, discerning between high-and low-quality resources, and referencing, despite intermediate competence levels [29][30][31]. The higher competence levels in information literacy skills among students in year level two to year four in this study, may be a result of teaching nursing-speci c skills in Research modules, such as evaluating reliable information and data, peer-reviewing, searching guidelines, and actionable information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%