A cross‐sectional study of dentine sensitivity in periodontitis patients in Trinidad and Tobago

Ramlogan, Shaun; Raman, Vidya; Rees, JS; Legall, George

doi:10.1111/idh.12202

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 37 publications

(114 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(5) Due to the importance and complexity of this problem, several studies have examined the prevalence of this problem in different societies. (6)(7)(8) Although many studies have already addressed the risk factors for DH, there is still no consensus on the causes of this problem. (9,10) On the other hand, recognizing the causes of this problem can be a basic and practical step toward reducing DH.…”

Section: Original Article Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the Prevalence of Dentin Hypersensitivity and Associated Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study

Mahdisiar

Anaraki

Bineshian³

et al. 2019

J Res Dentomaxillofac Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Aim: Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) is one of the most common problems in dentistry. Several factors affect DH. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of this problem and identify the associated factors. Materials and Methods: : In this cross-sectional study, 300 patients who referred to the operative dentistry department of Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, were examined. Demographic information and other related factors were recorded using a questionnaire. One examiner then examined the subjects regarding the potential related clinical factors. DH was evaluated using evaporative and tactile tests and was categorized using the visual analog scale (VAS). Descriptive data were presented as frequency and mean. Chi-Square test was used to examine the related factors at the significance level of 0.05. Result: The overall prevalence of DH was 21%. The correlation of horizontal brushing technique (P<0.005), hard toothbrushes (P<0.0001), gingival recession (P<0.0001), history of gingival surgery (P<0.001), tooth wear (P<0.001), traumatic occlusion (P<0.005), and bleaching toothpastes (P<0.005) with DH prevalence was significant. Conclusion: According to the results, high awareness about DH and its associated factors is mandatory.

show abstract

Section: Original Article Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the Prevalence of Dentin Hypersensitivity and Associated Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study

Mahdisiar

Anaraki

Bineshian³

et al. 2019

J Res Dentomaxillofac Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The prevalence, clinical features, and related factors of dentin hypersensitivity in the Turkish population

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Brazilian undergraduates' and dentists' knowledge on preventing, diagnosing and managing dentin hypersensitivity: A cross‐sectional questionnaire study

Mosquim,

Zabeu,

Jacomine

et al. 2024

Int J Dental Hygiene

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesTo analyse the knowledge of dental undergraduates and dentists on the prevention, diagnosis and management of dentin hypersensitivity (DH); to compare their knowledge scores; and to understand the related variables using a regression model.MethodsAn original online questionnaire investigated the attitudes, self‐reported knowledge (‘how much they thought they knew’) and real knowledge (‘how much they really knew’) of 132 students and 338 dentists. Data were analysed descriptively, both knowledge scores were compared using Mann–Whitney and Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests and data were subjected to two multiple linear regression analyses considering real knowledge scores as the dependent variable (α < 0.05).ResultsThe self‐reported knowledge on DH was higher than the real knowledge for both students and dentists, but dentists presented the highest scores. Gingival recession and acidic diet were reported as the main predisposing factors for DH by undergraduates and dentists. Students normally managed DH with dietary and hygiene instructions followed by a desensitizing agent application, while dentists managed with occlusal adjustments. The mechanism of glutaraldehyde/HEMA and bioactive fillers on DH is widely unknown by students and dentists. The majority of the questioned individuals cannot differentiate DH from sensitivity of caries or molar‐incisor hypomineralization.ConclusionBoth students and dentists overestimate their knowledge of DH, revealing deficiencies in prevention, diagnosis and management. Students' knowledge improves towards the end of the Dentistry course, while younger dentists and PhD holders are more knowledgeable. Institutions should implement ongoing DH education for undergraduates and conduct interventions for experienced professionals, especially older ones.

show abstract

A cross‐sectional study of dentine sensitivity in periodontitis patients in Trinidad and Tobago

Cited by 4 publications

References 37 publications

Evaluation of the Prevalence of Dentin Hypersensitivity and Associated Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study

Evaluation of the Prevalence of Dentin Hypersensitivity and Associated Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study

The prevalence, clinical features, and related factors of dentin hypersensitivity in the Turkish population

Brazilian undergraduates' and dentists' knowledge on preventing, diagnosing and managing dentin hypersensitivity: A cross‐sectional questionnaire study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About