2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cross-sectional examination of the 24-hour movement behaviours in Canadian youth with physical and sensory disabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research to date regarding movement behaviors in children with NDD has largely focused solely on the prevalence of meeting guidelines developed for children who are TD. 9,10 The present study examined 24-hour movement guideline adherence among children with NDD compared to children who were TDincluding a focus on the impact of disability severityand explored associations between 24-hour movement guideline adherence and health outcomes in children with NDD and children who were TD. For the first time, we have shown inverse associations between disability severity and 24-hour movement guideline adherence in children with NDD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research to date regarding movement behaviors in children with NDD has largely focused solely on the prevalence of meeting guidelines developed for children who are TD. 9,10 The present study examined 24-hour movement guideline adherence among children with NDD compared to children who were TDincluding a focus on the impact of disability severityand explored associations between 24-hour movement guideline adherence and health outcomes in children with NDD and children who were TD. For the first time, we have shown inverse associations between disability severity and 24-hour movement guideline adherence in children with NDD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study of fifty-four Canadian children with disabilities found that only 3.7% met all three guidelines concurrently. 9 Furthermore, research using National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH) data found that only 5.4% of children with chronic health conditions met all three guidelines, 10 which was significantly lower than the 8.2% of TD children. Given the infancy of this research, more data investigating 24-hour movement behaviors is needed to understand how guideline adherence may be different for children living with chronic medical conditions or disabilities.…”
Section: Implications Of Disability Severity On 24-hour Movement Guideline Adherence Among Children With Neurodevelopmental Disorders In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research to date regarding movement behaviors in children with NDD has largely focused solely on the prevalence of meeting guidelines developed for children who are TD. 7,8 The present study examined 24-hour movement guideline adherence among children with NDD compared to children who were TDincluding a focus on the impact of disability severityand explored associations between 24-hour movement guideline adherence and health outcomes in children with NDD and children who were TD. For the first time, we have shown inverse associations between disability severity and 24-hour movement guideline adherence in children with NDD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results from this study support previous work showing North American children with chronic health conditions or disabilities meet the 24-hour movement guidelines at lower rates than TD children. 7,8 Together, these findings may reflect the fact that current 24-hour movement guidelines may not translate to populations beyond TD children. There has been progress in this regard of late: WHO recently released Guidelines for Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior for children and adolescents with disabilities, 4,10 but these recommendations were largely based on findings from studies examining TD children due to a lack of research that provides data specific to children with disabilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation