2012
DOI: 10.1002/eat.22012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cross‐sectional analysis of the cognitive model of bulimia nervosa

Abstract: While the results of this research provide some preliminary evidence for the validity of the cognitive model as an explanation of the persistence of bulimic symptoms, further work is required to develop the model.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(42 reference statements)
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present results together with earlier ones thus suggest that, while maladaptive self-beliefs are present in a wide range of psychopathological states (including bulimia nervosa [36] and psychosis [37]) and are thus transdiagnostic, the three categories of self-beliefs could be distinctly distorted in different psychopathological states. Finally, these exaggerated high standards are strongly associated with the social problems encountered in real-life situations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The present results together with earlier ones thus suggest that, while maladaptive self-beliefs are present in a wide range of psychopathological states (including bulimia nervosa [36] and psychosis [37]) and are thus transdiagnostic, the three categories of self-beliefs could be distinctly distorted in different psychopathological states. Finally, these exaggerated high standards are strongly associated with the social problems encountered in real-life situations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Their results indicated that these three categories of eating disorder thoughts (negative, positive, and permissive), as well as two negative beliefs (self-loathing and demanding/needing help and support) significantly predicted variance in binge-eating pathology in a community sample. Bergin and Wade (2012) with the model, they found that negative self-beliefs were associated with negative affect, that negative affect was associated with both positive and negative thoughts about eating, that beliefs about eating were associated with eating behaviours, and that binge eating was associated with negative self-beliefs. They also found some inconsistencies with the model: they did not find an association between compensatory behaviour and negative self-beliefs, nor did they find any significant association of any behaviours with permissive thoughts.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Cooper et al [23] hypothesised that these eating beliefs are triggered by the experience of negative affect and that the positive, negative, and permissive beliefs interact and ultimately lead to a binge eating episode. Bergin and Wade [32] used multiple regression analyses and structural equation modelling (SEM) to test the predictions of the cognitive model of BN. Results of these analyses identified an association between negative self-beliefs and negative affect, an association between negative affect and eating beliefs, and an association between both positive and permissive beliefs and binge eating.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%