2001
DOI: 10.1093/protein/14.9.633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cross-section of the fitness landscape of dihydrofolate reductase

Abstract: In vitro molecular evolution is regarded as a hill-climbing on a fitness landscape in sequence space, where the 'fitness' is a quantitative measure of a certain physicochemical property of a biopolymer. We analyzed a 'cross-section' of the enzymatic activity landscape of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) by using a method of analysis of a fitness landscape. We limited the sequence space of interest to the five-dimensional sequence space, where the coordinate corresponds to the 1st, 16th, 20th, 42nd and 92nd site … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
81
0
6

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
81
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, both landscapes share common features, such as the existence of fitness holes due to unconditionally lethal genotypes or the presence of pervasive epistatic interactions. The topographies of both empirical landscapes match pretty well with the expectations from a random uncorrelated landscape, lying somewhere between the extreme case of the house-of-cards model (31,41), in which the fitness of each genotype is absolutely independent of the fitness of the other genotypes, and the less radical case of the rough Mount Fuji model (31,42), which combines properties of both the house-of-cards model and a purely multiplicative landscape.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nonetheless, both landscapes share common features, such as the existence of fitness holes due to unconditionally lethal genotypes or the presence of pervasive epistatic interactions. The topographies of both empirical landscapes match pretty well with the expectations from a random uncorrelated landscape, lying somewhere between the extreme case of the house-of-cards model (31,41), in which the fitness of each genotype is absolutely independent of the fitness of the other genotypes, and the less radical case of the rough Mount Fuji model (31,42), which combines properties of both the house-of-cards model and a purely multiplicative landscape.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The ruggedness of the landscape can be evaluated using several different measures (Table 2). For instance, the ratio of mean slope to roughness, , (31) showed similar values for both hosts, and in both cases the values were Ͼ1, indicating that the landscapes are rugged in relationship to the average slope of the peaks. A recently proposed measure of epistasis is the correlation between fitness effects of a given genotype and all their one-step neighbors, i.e., (32).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, because multiple alleles at the same site are contained within the landscape, we may study whether changes in the shape of the landscape are site-or amino acid-specific. We computed various landscape statistics (roughness-to-slope ratio, fraction of epistasis, and the recently proposed gamma statistics; SI Appendix, Supporting Information 1: Extended Materials and Methods) (10,11,14) and compared them with expectations from theoretical landscape models [NK (36)(37)(38), RMF (39,40), HoC (41), egg-box landscapes (14); for brief definitions of these terms, see SI Appendix, Supporting Information 2: Overview of Different Fitness Landscape Models Introduced in the Main Text]. Whenever necessary, we provide an analytical extension of the used statistic to the case of multiallelic landscapes (Materials and Methods).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4), generally based on the combination of previously observed beneficial mutations or on the dissection of an observed adaptive walk (i.e., a combination of mutations that have been observed to be beneficial in concert). Secondly, theoretical research has proposed different landscape architectures [such as the House-of-Cards (HoC), the Kauffman NK (NK), and the Rough Mount Fuji (RMF) model], studied their respective properties, and developed a number of statistics that characterize the landscape and quantify the expected degree of epistasis (i.e., interaction effects between mutations) (10)(11)(12)(13)(14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%