Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2911451.2914666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cross-Platform Collection of Social Network Profiles

Abstract: The proliferation of Internet-enabled devices and services has led to a shifting balance between digital and analogue aspects of our everyday lives. In the face of this development there is a growing demand for the study of privacy hazards, the potential for unique user de-anonymization and information leakage between the various social media profiles many of us maintain. To enable the structured study of such adversarial effects, this paper presents a dedicated dataset of cross-platform social network persona… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Finally, we compute the average tweeting rate for every user as the ratio of total number of lifetime tweets over the number of days since the account was created. To exclude what are likely to be automated accounts in both rumor and control datasets, we retain users with an average tweeting rate less than or equal to 24 tweets per day (following posting activity thresholds such as in [43,68]). Applying this criteria, we discard 6,463 (26%) users from rumor and 144,904 (31%) users from control sets.…”
Section: User Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Finally, we compute the average tweeting rate for every user as the ratio of total number of lifetime tweets over the number of days since the account was created. To exclude what are likely to be automated accounts in both rumor and control datasets, we retain users with an average tweeting rate less than or equal to 24 tweets per day (following posting activity thresholds such as in [43,68]). Applying this criteria, we discard 6,463 (26%) users from rumor and 144,904 (31%) users from control sets.…”
Section: User Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is growing interest in cross-platform research. Methods to facilitate cross-platform analysis have focused on similarities in usernames and user metadata, which may capture only a subset of activity across platforms (Han Veiga and Eickhoff 2016; Malhotra et al 2012; Goga et al 2013; Zafarani and Liu 2009). This content-focused method offers an alternative approach for cross-platform research in social science, one that can capture the spread of ideas and information relevant to many areas such as the spread of misinformation and social mobilization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They extracted representative features from these sources to characterize users with various views. Han Veiga and Eickhoff (2016) collected data from three different social media platforms (Twitter, Foursquare and Instagram) and have tried to create online footprints of 850 users descriptively. Similarly, Farseev et al (2015) performed a comprehensive user profile learning from different views by using data from Twitter, Foursquare, Instagram and Facebook.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%