2023
DOI: 10.1353/lan.2023.a900090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cross-language acoustic space for vocalic phonation distinctions

Abstract: Many languages use phonation types for phonemic or allophonic distinctions. This study examines the acoustic structure of the phonetic space for vowel phonations across languages. Our sample of eleven languages includes languages with contrastive modal, breathy, creaky, lax, tense, harsh, and/or pharyngealized phonations, and languages with allophonic nonmodal phonation on particular tones. In compiling and analyzing this sample we address related issues such as contrast vs. allophony, phonetic similarity acro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SoE does not credibly differ for vowels as a function of preceding aspiration or the manner of the preceding consonant, suggesting that aspiration does not greatly impact the strength of the vowel's voice source. Voice quality measures point to breathiness over most of the vowel's duration: vowels after aspiration are characterized by lowered CPP and elevated H1 * -A3 * , which respectively signal reduced periodicity and greater spectral tilt, both acoustic signatures of breathier phonation (Esposito 2010;, Keating et al 2023). This pattern is also attested for breathy-release voiced aspirates in the Indo-Aryan languages (Clements & Khatiwada 2007;Dutta 2007;Mikuteit & Reetz 2007;Esposito & Khan 2012;Berkson 2013;Dmitrieva & Dutta 2020) but not for all voiced aspirates universally (cf.…”
Section: Following Vowel Phonationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SoE does not credibly differ for vowels as a function of preceding aspiration or the manner of the preceding consonant, suggesting that aspiration does not greatly impact the strength of the vowel's voice source. Voice quality measures point to breathiness over most of the vowel's duration: vowels after aspiration are characterized by lowered CPP and elevated H1 * -A3 * , which respectively signal reduced periodicity and greater spectral tilt, both acoustic signatures of breathier phonation (Esposito 2010;, Keating et al 2023). This pattern is also attested for breathy-release voiced aspirates in the Indo-Aryan languages (Clements & Khatiwada 2007;Dutta 2007;Mikuteit & Reetz 2007;Esposito & Khan 2012;Berkson 2013;Dmitrieva & Dutta 2020) but not for all voiced aspirates universally (cf.…”
Section: Following Vowel Phonationmentioning
confidence: 99%