2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cross-lagged path analysis of five intrapersonal determinants of smoking cessation

Abstract: Background Prominent theories of drug use underscore the importance of considering the inter-relationships (e.g., reciprocal relations, indirect effects) of determinants of drug use behavior. In the area of smoking, few studies have examined multiple determinants of cessation in this way, and in prospective analyses. The current study is an examination of the prospective cross-lagged relationships among five intrapersonal determinants of cessation: Methods Data from a longitudinal cohort study on racial diff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we are conducting assessments at multiple time points, which will allow for the examination of how factors differ at baseline and change over time for African American and White and how these differences are related to cessation. Few longitudinal comparisons have been conducted to provide evidence of differences in factors that facilitate quitting for African American and White [29, 30]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, we are conducting assessments at multiple time points, which will allow for the examination of how factors differ at baseline and change over time for African American and White and how these differences are related to cessation. Few longitudinal comparisons have been conducted to provide evidence of differences in factors that facilitate quitting for African American and White [29, 30]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing trials have often enrolled unequal proportions of African American and White smokers and, because examination of racial differences in cessation was not the primary aim, were underpowered to make such comparisons [19, 22]. Others have relied on self-reported abstinence [23, 24], which is prone to misreporting and overestimation of abstinence [2528], reported abstinence at early (e.g., Weeks 1–4) but not later time points (e.g., Week 26) [29, 30], or been conducted in special treatment settings (e.g., Veterans Affairs patients, smokers in the criminal justice system) which limits generalizability of the findings [23, 31]. Existing studies have also not been stratified by race on age or gender or ensured recruitment of African American and White smokers of comparable socioeconomic status (SES) [20, 21], all key factors known to impact smoking cessation [32, 24, 3338].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In tobacco research, behavioral patterns of smoking are widely used as indicators of physical dependence. The general pattern of Latino smokers differs notably from that of non‐Latino White smokers in that they smoke fewer cigarettes per day and are more likely to be “light smokers” (typically defined as less than 10 cigarettes per day; Benowitz, Bernert, Caraballo, Holiday, & Wang, ; Caraballo et al, ; Daza et al, ; Lawrence, Fagan, Backinger, Gibson, & Hartman, ; Trinidad et al, ; Trinidad et al, ), are more likely to smoke on a non‐daily basis (Lawrence et al, ; Trinidad et al, ; Trinidad et al, ), and wait longer after waking to smoke (Branstetter, Mercincavage, & Muscat, ; Castro et al, ; Daza et al, ; Trinidad et al, ).…”
Section: Generalizability Of Known Determinantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other research evidence is mixed. On the one hand, motivation was found to be positively related to abstinence self-efficacy among persons attempting to quit smoking (Castro et al, 2014), while on the other hand, brief motivational interventions were not found to increase abstinence self-efficacy among persons with alcohol use disorders (Romo et al, 2009). There is a need to examine the relationships between these recovery resources among persons with substance used disorders to better understand intrapersonal dynamics of recovery-related change.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%