2008
DOI: 10.1080/10413200802415048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cross-Cultural Psychometric Evaluation of the Athletic Identity Measurement Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
36
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher scores are indicative of a higher degree of identification with the athletic role. The AIMS has been found to be a reliable and valid measure (Visek, Hurst, Maxwell, & Watson, 2008). Within this sample the Cronbach's alpha was .84.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Higher scores are indicative of a higher degree of identification with the athletic role. The AIMS has been found to be a reliable and valid measure (Visek, Hurst, Maxwell, & Watson, 2008). Within this sample the Cronbach's alpha was .84.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…According to Maxwell and Moores, internal reliabilities of the two subscales were good (Aggressiveness: a 5 .83-.84; Anger: a 5 .78-.83) as were test-retest correlations (Aggressiveness: r 5 .84; Anger: r 5 .86). More recently, the internal consistency of the CAAS items has been established in a Hong Kong Chinese population [Visek et al, 2008, manuscript submitted for publication]. Visek et al reported a coefficients ranging from acceptable to good (Aggressiveness a 5 .79; Anger a 5 .72; Total Score a 5 .86).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus, scores may range from a low of 7 to a high of 49, with higher AIMS scores indicative of stronger identity with the athlete role. The validity and reliability of the AIMS has been supported in American [Brewer and Cornelius, 2001;Visek et al, 2009] and Hong Kong Chinese athletes [Visek et al, 2008, manuscript submitted for publication].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The higher order factor structure found the AIMS to be applicable to both men and women and to athletes and nonathletes. Visek et al (2008) cross culturally validated the use of the AIMS. They looked at both American and English-speaking Hong Kong Chinese populations.…”
Section: Instrumentation Athletic Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%