2008
DOI: 10.1177/1069397108326273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cross-Cultural Perspective on Aggressiveness in the Workplace

Abstract: The study aimed to investigate whether employees' ethnic culture affects their organizational aggression toward their managers. The authors compared aggression toward managers in two samples of Israeli employees—Jews who are low collectivists and Arabs who are high collectivists. The study's sample was composed of 160 employees in 19 community centers—80 Israeli Jews and 80 Israeli Arabs. Results indicate that ethnic group is the major predictor of employees' aggressive behavior, whereas gender predicts aggres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, individualism and collectivism are not necessarily mutually exclusive concepts, but can rather be considered as representing endpoints of a continuum along which a specific culture or an individual is nested (Oyserman et al 2002). There are also obvious within-culture variations between countries with a prevailing individualistic versus a more collectivistic orientation (Galin and Avraham 2009;Herman et al 2008). Despite these caveats, we chose to incorporate this distinction in the first and preliminary approach for this study, because it seemed quite plausible that the overall predominance of collectivistic or individualistic cultural attributes in a particular society or nation would have the greatest bearing on how adolescents cope with stress.…”
Section: Stress Perception Coping Style and Culturementioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, individualism and collectivism are not necessarily mutually exclusive concepts, but can rather be considered as representing endpoints of a continuum along which a specific culture or an individual is nested (Oyserman et al 2002). There are also obvious within-culture variations between countries with a prevailing individualistic versus a more collectivistic orientation (Galin and Avraham 2009;Herman et al 2008). Despite these caveats, we chose to incorporate this distinction in the first and preliminary approach for this study, because it seemed quite plausible that the overall predominance of collectivistic or individualistic cultural attributes in a particular society or nation would have the greatest bearing on how adolescents cope with stress.…”
Section: Stress Perception Coping Style and Culturementioning
confidence: 98%
“…3. The sharp differences between distinct subgroups of Israeli society (ethnic, religious, or cultural) in the way violence is treated, accepted, or even encouraged (see Carmi-Iluz et al, 2005;Efrat-Treister & Rafaeli, 2011;Galin & Avraham, 2009). In the current study, the interviewees expressed their frustration regarding their relationship with dysfunctional fans and their impact on decision-making processes and outcomes in football and basketball clubs in Israel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High power distance has been associated with compliant behavior because cultures high in power distance tend to be more authoritarian and tend to stress conformity and submissiveness (Hofstede, 2001). Therefore, when it is necessary for people from high-power-distance cultures to interact with others, they tend to engage in obedient communication strategies that compromise or collaborate with others (Galin & Avraham, 2009). People in high-power-distance societies also tend to accept inequality in the allocation of power and human rights (Hofstede, 2001).…”
Section: Power Distance As a Predictor Of Faceworkmentioning
confidence: 99%