A Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Collective Efficacy Questionnaire for Sports (CEQS): Validity Evidence for a Brazilian Version

Paes, Marcio Roberto; Taconeli, César Augusto; Forbellone, Andressa Avedaño; Fernandes, Gabriel Jungles; Feltz, Deborah L.; Stefanello, Joice Mara Facco

doi:10.1177/00315125211029907

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 43 publications

(89 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Collective Efficacy Questionnaire for Sport (CEQS). As a tool for providing external validity to the MATS, some participants (as described above) also responded to the Collective Efficacy Questionnaire for Sports -Brazilian Version (CEQS-B) (Paes et al, 2021), previously adapted to Brazilian Portuguese and separately validated from the original English version (Short et al, 2005). We selected this instrument because there is evidence of a relationship between teamwork and collective efficacy constructs that underlie the MATS and CEQS, respectively, as found in previous research with the English version of the MATS (McEwan, 2020).…”

Section: Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric Support for a Brazilian Version of the Multidimensional Assessment of Teamwork in Sport (MATS-B)

Paes,

Perez Arthur,

Machado

et al. 2023

Percept Mot Skills

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, we investigated psychometric support for a version of the Multidimensional Assessment of Teamwork in Sport (MATS) that would be suitable for Brazilian athletes. Four translators participated in the back-translation of this instrument from English to Portuguese, two specialists synthesized the Portuguese and English back-translation versions, and 10 experts assessed the questionnaire items and judged their content validity. To evaluate structural validity, we performed confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We evaluated internal item reliability with a sample of 447 athletes who completed the adapted measure (the MATS-B). Finally, 202 other athletes completed both the MATS-B and a second measure of collective efficacy (CEQS-B) to provide external validity correlates. With these data, the MATS-B now provides valid and reliable data supporting its use with Brazilian athletes in an adapted assessment tool that aligns with the conceptual framework of teamwork in sports.

show abstract

Section: Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric Support for a Brazilian Version of the Multidimensional Assessment of Teamwork in Sport (MATS-B)

Paes,

Perez Arthur,

Machado

et al. 2023

Percept Mot Skills

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A todo lo anterior hay que señalar que en estudios posteriores del CEQS donde no hubo una elección forzada de ítems en el AFE basada en la teoría, se describieron la existencia de estructuras de cuatro factores (Santi et al, 2019) y de dos factores (Fransen et al, 2014), todas ellas, con un número desigual de ítems por factor, lo que confirma nuestras dudas sobre la validez de la estructura del CEQS. También es cierto que en otros estudios se han replicado la estructura de 5 factores, como le sucedió a: Martínez et al, (2011) en España, Paes (2014) en Brasil, Boughattas y Noureddine (2017) y a Martínez-Alvarado et al (2019) en México. En el caso de los tres primeros, solo se hicieron AFC y con únicamente el modelo de cinco factores de Shorts et al (2005), lo que no permite determinar cuál es la mejor estructura para explicar las respuestas del CEQS, más aún cuando no existe un rango específico aceptable de valores para interpretar a los indicadores de ajustes del AFC como sucede con el coeficiente chi o ji cuadrado (χ²), cuando se utiliza en "muestras mayores de 200 encuestados" (Hair et al, 1999, 680), la razón χ² normada (χ²/gl), el índice de bondad de ajuste (GFI), el índice de no centralidad (NCP), el índice de validación cruzada esperada (ECVI), el residuo cuadrático medio (RMSR), el índice de bondad de ajuste (GFI), el índice de ajuste normado de parsimonia (PNFI) y el índice de calidad de ajuste parsimonia (PGFI), por lo que la interpretación del grado de ajuste en un AFC, exige el uso de la estrategia de modelos rivales, razón por la cual todos los estudios anteriores cometieron el sesgo confirmatorio que describe Hair et al (1999).…”

Section: Profil Et Typologie Du Questionnaire D'efficacité Collective...unclassified

Perfil y Tipología del Cuestionario de Eficacia Colectiva para el Deporte (CEQS) en Colombia

Ladrón¹,

Millán²,

Gómez

et al. 2022

PSICO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Se examina la estructura factorial, las propiedades psicométricas y las normas de interpretación y corrección del perfil y la tipología de la adaptación al español del Cuestionario de Eficacia Colectiva para el Deporte (CEQS) de Martínez, Guillén y Feltz (2011), en una muestra de deportistas colombianos, debido a que en sus validaciones previas no se aplicaron estrategias para minimizar el sesgo de indeterminación factorial, confirmatorio y de capitalización del azar. Se encontró una estructura de 2 factores, diferente a la de 5 que originalmente postularon Martínez y col. (2011). La validez convergente muestra que los dos factores predicen la calidad de la relación de los jugadores. Finalmente, no se encontraron diferencias en los puntajes de los dos factores del CEQS asociados a variables sociodemográficas ni sociodeportivas. Se presentan recomendaciones sobre la utilización e interpretación de este instrumento por parte de los expertos en psicología del deporte, entrenadores y administradores deportivos y la contribución de la implementación del CEQS a la mejora de la eficacia en deportes de equipo.

show abstract

“…However, the instruments developed in relation to sport are generally in English, seriously limiting the advancement of sports psychology research in the Maghreb where there is a very high demand for assessment tools (Zeinoun et al, 2021). The translation and cross-cultural validation of questionnaires in sport psychology make new research in other countries possible (Paes et al, 2021). More particularly, measures of mindfulness are important in countries where Arabic is spoken.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adaptation and Validation of the Arabic Version of the Mindfulness Inventory for Sport

Salha

Kern

Abdelatif³

et al. 2022

Percept Mot Skills

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Our goal for this study was to adapt the Mindfulness Inventory for Sport (MIS) into written Arabic that would be easily understood in North African countries (Tunisia, Algeria and Morocco or TAM). Assessment tools in Arabic, such as this MIS-TAM version, are rare but essential for evaluating the effectiveness of sport psychology interventions. We adopted a committee approach to obtain a first Arabic version of the MIS. We asked a team of translators to adapt the items to the level of understanding of 13-year-old athletes by selecting words common to the culture of the three countries. The validation process underwent three phases. In Study 1, we tested MIS-TAM for clarity and deemed it acceptable. In Study 2 we tested the construct validity of two different models with confirmatory factorial analyses. These analyses confirmed that the structure of the 15-item MIS-TAM was psychometrically similar to the original version; it had a first order model encompassing three dimensions: Awareness, Non-Judgement and Refocusing. Analyses also found the internal consistency of the MIS-TAM acceptable. We assessed convergent validity in Study 3 with the Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale, but no correlations between the two instruments were significant. In conclusion, the MIS-TAM has acceptable psychometric properties, though further work is needed regarding convergent validity. The rigorous work of translation and adaptation focused on shared linguistics in three target countries, and this questionnaire will also prove useful in other countries where Arabic is the main language.

show abstract

A Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Collective Efficacy Questionnaire for Sports (CEQS): Validity Evidence for a Brazilian Version

Cited by 3 publications

References 43 publications

Psychometric Support for a Brazilian Version of the Multidimensional Assessment of Teamwork in Sport (MATS-B)

Psychometric Support for a Brazilian Version of the Multidimensional Assessment of Teamwork in Sport (MATS-B)

Perfil y Tipología del Cuestionario de Eficacia Colectiva para el Deporte (CEQS) en Colombia

Adaptation and Validation of the Arabic Version of the Mindfulness Inventory for Sport

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About