2016
DOI: 10.1680/jgele.15.00182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cross-anisotropic formulation for elasto-plastic models

Abstract: A cross-anisotropic formulation for elasto-plastic constitutive models based on a non-uniform scaling of the stress tensor is described. Taking advantage of the material symmetries characterising cross-anisotropy, only two scaling factors, one for the normal stress components and one for the shear stress components, are required. It is shown that the formulation can be easily introduced in already implemented models with minor modifications. The performance of this formulation is investigated by reproducing th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, this isotropic strength criterion cannot characterize strength anisotropy in rocks. We follow the elastoplastic models of Mánica et al 71 and Forero et al 70 and formulate an anisotropic strength criterion with the help of the unitless scalar orientation parameters, 𝐶 N and 𝐶 S . As the strength of anisotropic rocks depends on how the loading is applied relative to the orientation of their anisotropy planes, this approach provides a simple way to relate the loading direction to the anisotropy direction.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet, this isotropic strength criterion cannot characterize strength anisotropy in rocks. We follow the elastoplastic models of Mánica et al 71 and Forero et al 70 and formulate an anisotropic strength criterion with the help of the unitless scalar orientation parameters, 𝐶 N and 𝐶 S . As the strength of anisotropic rocks depends on how the loading is applied relative to the orientation of their anisotropy planes, this approach provides a simple way to relate the loading direction to the anisotropy direction.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another recent study by Ref. 70 used Bayesian inference to back out the twelve coefficients of the Lade-Kim isotropic model using a non-uniform scaling of the stress tensor 71 and two scaling factors, 𝐶 N and 𝐶 S , that link the orientation of the anisotropy planes with the loading direction. The maximum deviatoric stresses and stressstrain curves predicted and simulated by their model were shown to be in good agreement with experimental data, but the authors did not present and investigate the uncertainty of the predicted maximum deviatoric stresses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where g is the plastic potential and  is a constant that controls the volumetric component The model has been extended to consider cross-anisotropy through a non-uniform scaling of the stress tensor, as described in [23]. As Figure 2 shows, the local coordinate system 1-2-3 corresponds to the principal axes of anisotropy with direction "2" oriented orthogonal to the isotropic plane.…”
Section: Instantaneous Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An appropriate selection of strength parameters and scaling factors allows a satisfactory matching of a specified strength variation with loading orientation. Details about the physical meaning of the anisotropy parameters, their effects and of the derivation of the corresponding elastoplastic constitutive matrix are given in [23]. .…”
Section: Instantaneous Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To include strength anisotropy in slope stability computations two main steps are required: the first one is to stablish a failure criterion introducing a dependency with loading direction, able to account for the observed variation of strength. A number of anisotropic failure criteria for soils have been proposed; a review can be found in Mánica et al (2016). The second step is to introduce the anisotropic criterion into an appropriate methodology for assessing the stability of slopes, such as: limit equilibrium methods, limit analyses or numerical methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%