2013
DOI: 10.1080/17449626.2012.756419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critique of humanitarian reason: agency, power, and privilege

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The societal expectation for PKFC to play a role in the local economy (whether adhered to or not) resembles elements of 'white saviour discourse' (Cole 2012;L'Anson and Pfeifer 2013); a narrative that might be encouraged by PKFC's link to UN peacekeeping and the white dominated aid industry that is in control of desirable resources.…”
Section: The Intersection Of Race and Povertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The societal expectation for PKFC to play a role in the local economy (whether adhered to or not) resembles elements of 'white saviour discourse' (Cole 2012;L'Anson and Pfeifer 2013); a narrative that might be encouraged by PKFC's link to UN peacekeeping and the white dominated aid industry that is in control of desirable resources.…”
Section: The Intersection Of Race and Povertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These criticisms of STMMs reflect many of the issues raised in critiques of humanitarian and development programs more broadly [ 13 , 23 , 35 ]. For example, as l’Anson and Pfeifer wrote about humanitarian aid, “… in most cases, NGOs and their supporters are deaf to the actual wants, needs, and desires – or, in other words, the agency – of those they are trying to aid.” This is a common concern with STMM’s, which are often driven by the needs of volunteers and the assumption that anything they offer is better than what communities already have.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%