[1988] Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume II: Software Track
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.1988.11820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critique of diffusion theory as a managerial framework for understanding adoption of software engineering innovations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firms tend to adopt a technology based on their innate characteristics, which fall into five categories: (1) innovative firms with a higher tolerance for the risk of uncertain results in an acceptable time frame, (2) early adopters, (3) early majority, (4) late majority, and (5) laggards .Characteristics of the innovation emphasized by the theory include relative advantage of the innovation compared to existing practices such as convenience, efficiency, and profitability. Other characteristics include whether the new technology is compatible with existing processes and the ease (or complexity) of its use (Bayer & Melone, 1989;Zmud, 1982).…”
Section: Diffusion Theory Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firms tend to adopt a technology based on their innate characteristics, which fall into five categories: (1) innovative firms with a higher tolerance for the risk of uncertain results in an acceptable time frame, (2) early adopters, (3) early majority, (4) late majority, and (5) laggards .Characteristics of the innovation emphasized by the theory include relative advantage of the innovation compared to existing practices such as convenience, efficiency, and profitability. Other characteristics include whether the new technology is compatible with existing processes and the ease (or complexity) of its use (Bayer & Melone, 1989;Zmud, 1982).…”
Section: Diffusion Theory Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of the cross-loading analysis showed that all items load higher on their respective intended latent variable compared to other latent variables. 2 Therefore, discriminant validity at the indicator level is ensured. Figure 2 shows all the path coefficients, significance levels and variance explained in the research model.…”
Section: Ds1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purpose of evaluating the construct both actual usage and intention of the future usage of OTC CCP by organizations have been employed. Adopters may make a binary decision to adopt or reject, or may choose differing levels of CCP usage (Bayer and Melone, 1989). Concerning adoption alone, a binary variable is applied based on whether an organization uses/is a member of OTC CCP or not.…”
Section: Adoption Constructmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study of technology adoption in the Brazilian medical equipment industry showed that organization factors are the largest contributors to the adoption of an innovation, specifically the presence or absence of leadership supporting the implementation (Zilber et al 2006). Similarly, a study sponsored by the Software Engineering Institute showed that social systems are the main enablers of innovation diffusion in software engineering organizations (Bayer and Melone 1989).…”
Section: Experience In Systems Engineering Cost Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%