A critical theory route to hegemony, world order and historical change: neo-Gramscian perspectives in International Relations

Abstract

Situated within a historical materialist problematic of social transformation that deploys many of the insights of the Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci, a crucial break emerged, in the 1980s, in the work of Robert Cox from mainstream International Relations (IR) approaches to hegemony. This article provides a comprehensive ‘state-of-the-discipline’ overview of this critical theory route to hegemony, world order and historical change. It does so by outlining the historical context within which various diverse but related neo-Gramscian perspectives emerged. Attention subsequently turns to highlight how conditions of capitalist economic crisis and structural change in the 1970s have been conceptualised, which inform contemporary debates about globalisation. Significantly, the discussion is also responsive to the various controversies and criticisms that surround the neo-Gramscian perspectives whilst, in conclusion, directions along which future research might proceed are elaborated. Hence providing a thorough survey of this historical materialist critical theory of hegemony and thus forms of social power through which conditions of capitalism are reproduced, mediated and contested.

Labour and the Struggle over the Future European Model of Capitalism: British and Swedish Trade Unions and their Positions on EMU and European Co-operation

“…A neo‐Gramscian perspective can overcome the problems of liberal IR and CPE approaches by considering the social relations of production to be the starting point of an investigation (Bieler and Morton 2004). Thus, the relations which organise material production are considered to be crucial for the wider institutional reproduction of social orders on both a national and an international level.…”

Transboundary water interaction III: contest and compliance

“…Transformative mechanisms of counter-hegemony seek to transform a hegemonic order through the direct or indirect undermining of the legitimacy of the foundations that support it (see Rupert 1993;Bieler and Morton 2004;Worth and Kuhling 2004). By questioning widely accepted understandings of reality (i.e.…”

Zelena ekonomija i njena uloga u neoliberalnom kapitalizmu

“…Rather it builds on the acceptance of certain imaginations of ways of living and is stabilised by diff erent institutions, which are operating along a complementary moral and ideological context. Th ereby, institutions infl uence human acting and thinking to (re-)produce a particular hegemonic "reality" (Bieler and Morton, 2004). Th e strength of hegemonic forces is their ability to penetrate society on a structural level and their presence in main societal areas such as economy, culture, gender, and class (Burnham, 1991).…”