2003
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.23-06-02453.2003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Critical Role for the Cannabinoid CB1Receptors in Alcohol Dependence and Stress-Stimulated Ethanol Drinking

Abstract: Although many people drink alcohol regularly, only some become addicted. Several studies have shown that genetic and environmental factors contribute to individual differences in the vulnerability to the effects of alcohol (Nestler, 2000; Kreek, 2001; Crabbe, 2002). Among the environmental factors, stress is perhaps the most important trigger for relapse after a period of abstinence (Koob and Nestler, 1997; Piazza and Le Moal, 1998; Koob and Le Moal, 2001; Weiss et al., 2001). Here we show that ethanol withdra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
102
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
5
102
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It therefore seems conceivable that the decrease in CB1R binding we found in the same region could have been an endogenous compensatory response. Of special interest, CB1R-deficient mice appear to suffer no signs of withdrawal upon alcohol discontinuation [42]. However, results concerning the relationship between anxiety levels and alcohol drinking are still ambiguous, and we did not measure behavioural aspects of withdrawal in this study [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It therefore seems conceivable that the decrease in CB1R binding we found in the same region could have been an endogenous compensatory response. Of special interest, CB1R-deficient mice appear to suffer no signs of withdrawal upon alcohol discontinuation [42]. However, results concerning the relationship between anxiety levels and alcohol drinking are still ambiguous, and we did not measure behavioural aspects of withdrawal in this study [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Our data extend this concept by showing that alterations of synaptic plasticity induced by addictive drugs can be compensated by homeostatic processes that, at least in the case of the psychoactive ingredient of marijuana, rescue synaptic functions up to a certain point. How this new form of homeostatic synaptic plasticity relates to the behavioral aspects of addiction is beyond the goal of this study, but it is remarkable that pharmacological manipulations of both CB1R and mGluR2/3 modulate addictive-drug-evoked behaviors (Fundytus et al, 1997;Helton et al, 1997;Ledent et al, 1999;Vandergriff and Rasmussen, 1999;Racz et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-hoc analysis of the effects of strain, collapsed across stress condition, showed that no strain significantly differed from another ( Figure 2). Previous studies have found inconsistent effects of various stress procedures on EtOH selfadministration in rats and mice [1,10,32,33,41,47,49,55,[59][60][61][62]. Similarly, work examining the effects of stress on sensitivity to the behavioral effects of acute EtOH challenge has not produced a clear consensus [7,16,20,21,26,34,45,48].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%