2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical review on various remediation approaches for heavy metal contaminants removal from contaminated soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 286 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, several soil trace metals remediation methods (physical, chemical, and biological) were implemented to mitigate trace metals contamination issues 24 . Physical remediation techniques are typically used for small-scale treatments and are not economically viable forest soil remediation options 25 . Chemical leaching and fixation are not permanent solutions since mangrove plants are deep-rooted and metals may further get released into the soil under conducive conditions 25 27 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several soil trace metals remediation methods (physical, chemical, and biological) were implemented to mitigate trace metals contamination issues 24 . Physical remediation techniques are typically used for small-scale treatments and are not economically viable forest soil remediation options 25 . Chemical leaching and fixation are not permanent solutions since mangrove plants are deep-rooted and metals may further get released into the soil under conducive conditions 25 27 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lot of studies have been conducted on remediation techniques for heavy metal polluted soil, including in-situ remediation techniques (surface capping, encapsulation, electrokinetic extraction, soil flushing, chemical immobilization, phytoremediation, bioremediation) and ex-situ remediation techniques (landfilling, soil washing, solidification, vitrification) 9 , 10 . These remediation techniques focus on reducing the maximum or bioavailable concentration of heavy metal in the soil 11 , 12 . Although these methods have high performance, most of them are expensive, harmful to the environment and time-consuming 13 , 14 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activated carbon is one of the most widely used adsorbent for dye removal [17][18][19][20][21]. Biopolymers as chitosane and nanochitosane and their composites were used as a prominent adsorbent for heavy metals and CR removal [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Different nanomaterials and nanocomposites have been used in a variety of science applications such as biomedical and environmental, especially as dye's adsorbants [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%