2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical review on inhibition of anaerobic digestion process by excess ammonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

15
481
4
12

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,061 publications
(561 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
15
481
4
12
Order By: Relevance
“…One form of dilution is co-digestion with a low nitrogen co-substrate to achieve a favourable C/N ratio and ensure that TAN and free ammonia nitrogen (FAN) remain below the threshold inhibitory concentrations. For animal manures this can be achieved by mixing with agricultural crops, as suggested by a number of researchers; this may also have the benefit of improving the volumetric methane production of the digester and thus its economic performance (Rajagopal et al, 2013). The co-digestion of cattle slurry with up to 50% fruit and vegetable wastes can provide a good methane yield (Callaghan et al, 2002) and an increase in methane production of 93% has been reported for chicken manure compared to its mono-digestion (Abouelenien et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One form of dilution is co-digestion with a low nitrogen co-substrate to achieve a favourable C/N ratio and ensure that TAN and free ammonia nitrogen (FAN) remain below the threshold inhibitory concentrations. For animal manures this can be achieved by mixing with agricultural crops, as suggested by a number of researchers; this may also have the benefit of improving the volumetric methane production of the digester and thus its economic performance (Rajagopal et al, 2013). The co-digestion of cattle slurry with up to 50% fruit and vegetable wastes can provide a good methane yield (Callaghan et al, 2002) and an increase in methane production of 93% has been reported for chicken manure compared to its mono-digestion (Abouelenien et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the high nitrogen and solids content, co-digestion of CM and MS in their original undiluted form may be technically challenging (Rajagopal et al, 2013). Dilution with water, however, involves the additional costs of the water required and the subsequent treatment of substantial amounts of effluent (Nie et al, 2015;Niu et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AD is an effective biochemical process for organic waste treatment and for biogas production because AD offers numerous significant advantages, such as low sludge production, low energy requirement, and green energy recovery. It has been evaluated as one of the most energy-efficient and environmentally beneficial technologies for bioenergy production [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Experiment 2, ammonia concentration was similar in all the tests, with 0.31 ± 0.02 gN-NH 3 /l as average value. Due to the proteinrich composition of fleshing, ammonia inhibition is reported by many authors as possible drawback of anaerobically treating such a waste (Chen et al, 2008;Kovács et al, 2013;Rajagopal et al, 2013). Nevertheless, this was not the case in our experiments due to the relatively low concentration of substrate that never lead to inhibitory condition from ammonia.…”
Section: Batch Testsmentioning
confidence: 63%