2023
DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2023.2194632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical review of ustekinumab for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis in adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ustekinumab has demonstrated effectiveness in inducing and maintaining clinical, endoscopic, and histologic remission in moderate-to-severe UC in both phase 3 clinical trials and realworld studies. The favorable risk-benefit ratio, efficacy on extra-intestinal manifestations, and effectiveness in patients who have failed other biologics position ustekinumab as an ideal candidate for first-, second-, or third-line therapy in UC [323]. For patients on ustekinumab therapy, the decision on whether to continue without endoscopic response evaluation may be considered in those with a decrease in fecal calprotectin (FC) levels of ≥500 µg/g at week 8.…”
Section: Il-12/il-23 Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ustekinumab has demonstrated effectiveness in inducing and maintaining clinical, endoscopic, and histologic remission in moderate-to-severe UC in both phase 3 clinical trials and realworld studies. The favorable risk-benefit ratio, efficacy on extra-intestinal manifestations, and effectiveness in patients who have failed other biologics position ustekinumab as an ideal candidate for first-, second-, or third-line therapy in UC [323]. For patients on ustekinumab therapy, the decision on whether to continue without endoscopic response evaluation may be considered in those with a decrease in fecal calprotectin (FC) levels of ≥500 µg/g at week 8.…”
Section: Il-12/il-23 Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a meta-evaluation of ustekinumab for UC, it was found that this agent has demonstrated efficacy and safety in both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real clinical practice [9]. The most common adverse event reported with ustekinumab was infection, with rates of 34% and 41% in the ustekinumab and adalimumab groups, respectively [10]. Another study by Moens et al reported similar findings, with eight events of infections in the ustekinumab group and ten events in the adalimumab group [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%