2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2006.12.092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical review of the complex pressure fluctuation phenomenon in gas–solids fluidized beds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
107
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(145 reference statements)
4
107
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative is to measure the differential pressure between a position in the bed and the freeboard. Compared to the single-point method, this method can eliminate the potential effect of the pressure variations in the freeboard (Bi, 2007). However, pressure variations in the freeboard are normally small, and a disadvantage of this method is that it leads to an "off-set" in the signal (i.e., the average pressure difference between the position in the bed and the freeboard) which decreases the obtainable resolution.…”
Section: Time-resolved Pressure Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative is to measure the differential pressure between a position in the bed and the freeboard. Compared to the single-point method, this method can eliminate the potential effect of the pressure variations in the freeboard (Bi, 2007). However, pressure variations in the freeboard are normally small, and a disadvantage of this method is that it leads to an "off-set" in the signal (i.e., the average pressure difference between the position in the bed and the freeboard) which decreases the obtainable resolution.…”
Section: Time-resolved Pressure Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported in literature that pressure fluctuations within the bed can be due to local and global contributions (Bi et al, 1995;Sasic et al, 2007;Bi, 2007). That fact leads to the use of different techniques focused on identifying and distin guishing those contributions from the measured signal.…”
Section: Frequency Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 8 shows the standard deviation profiles of pressure fluctuations along the dipleg under different particle mass fluxes. The pressure fluctuations are attributed to many factors in the operation of diplegs, including particle clusters, gas bubbles, wall friction, and instability of feed and discharge, which enable the pressure fluctuations to be multi-scale and complex in nature (Bi 2007;Jing and Li 1999). When G s was small (such as G s \ 50.0 kg m -2 s -1 ), the fluidization pattern in the dipleg was featured by the coexistence of dilute falling flow and dense flow.…”
Section: Standard Deviation Of the Pressure Fluctuationsmentioning
confidence: 99%