1994
DOI: 10.1016/0924-8579(94)90049-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical review of the dosage of teicoplanin in Europe and the USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
67
0
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
2
67
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There seems to be little difference between the glycopeptides provided that teicoplanin is dosed appropriately, especially for cases of endocarditis (319). In a recent systematic review and meta-analysis, all-cause mortality rates were similar between teicoplanin and vancomycin treatments, with significantly greater toxicity when vancomycin was prescribed (283).…”
Section: Antibiotic Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There seems to be little difference between the glycopeptides provided that teicoplanin is dosed appropriately, especially for cases of endocarditis (319). In a recent systematic review and meta-analysis, all-cause mortality rates were similar between teicoplanin and vancomycin treatments, with significantly greater toxicity when vancomycin was prescribed (283).…”
Section: Antibiotic Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlations between doses and pharmacokinetic profiles of glycopeptides in humans are well described, but the correlation between the pharmacokinetic profile and the effect of treatment of patients has not been fully elucidated (1,12,16,26,28). Because of fear of toxic effects, it was previously recommended that serum drug concentrations be monitored regularly during glycopeptide therapy, at least as trough concentrations but eventually also as peak concentrations (1,6,7,12,16,26,28,29).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of fear of toxic effects, it was previously recommended that serum drug concentrations be monitored regularly during glycopeptide therapy, at least as trough concentrations but eventually also as peak concentrations (1,6,7,12,16,26,28,29). The effect of treatment has been correlated to dose and serum drug concentrations, but most studies have been retrospective and have focused on treatment failures and the correlation to serum drug concentrations (1,6,7,12,16,26,28,29). It has not been possible to conclude which one or more of the pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters are the most important and best predictors for the effects of treatment in humans (1,6,12,16,26,28).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown a relationship between TEIC serum concentration and clinical e‹ciency. 1,6,16) A logistic regression analysis showed that the probability of successful treatment with TEIC declined with age and increased with mean concentration at non-steady state. 5) A appropriate loading dose regimen must be considered mandatory for all patients, regardless of their renal function, to reach the range of appropriate concentrations early in the treatment period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) It is generally considered that the trough concentration of TEIC should be >10 mg/mL for MRSA infections and >20 mg/mL for deep-seated infections, such as endocarditis, bone and joint infection, and osteomyelitis. 2 4) Although an intravenous loading regimen for TEIC consisting of 400 mg every 12 h for theˆrst three doses has been recommended in many countries, some studies have reported to remain <10 15 mg/ mL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%