1964
DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1964.tb00199.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Critical Review of Some New Methods in Animal Analgesiometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnitude of the hyperalgesra induced by a test substance was calculated as the percentage decrease in pressure requrred to elicit withdrawal, relative to the base Irne. In the rat, the maximum decrease in mechanical nociceptive thresholds produced by test substances using the paw withdrawal test correlates well with the analgesic potency of intradermal injections of the same substance in humans (Evans, 1964;Ferriera, 1983). The fMLP (Sigma Chemrcal Co., St. LOUIS, MO) was initially dissolved In 10 ~1 of dimethylsulfoxide to which, then, was added Hanks' balanced salt solution (HBSS) containing 0.1% ovalbumrn and 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The magnitude of the hyperalgesra induced by a test substance was calculated as the percentage decrease in pressure requrred to elicit withdrawal, relative to the base Irne. In the rat, the maximum decrease in mechanical nociceptive thresholds produced by test substances using the paw withdrawal test correlates well with the analgesic potency of intradermal injections of the same substance in humans (Evans, 1964;Ferriera, 1983). The fMLP (Sigma Chemrcal Co., St. LOUIS, MO) was initially dissolved In 10 ~1 of dimethylsulfoxide to which, then, was added Hanks' balanced salt solution (HBSS) containing 0.1% ovalbumrn and 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This conditioning analysis of morphine tolerance is supported by several findings: (a) It is necessary to have a consistent set of environmental cues reliably predicting the systemic effects of morphine if rapid tolerance is to be observed (Adams et al, 1969;Kay an et al, 1969; Experiment 1A of the present report); (b) experience with morphine in one environment does not facilitate the acquisition of morphine tolerance in another environment (Experiment IB); (c) the compensatory hyperalgesic CR may be directly observed in morphine-tolerant animals when they are confronted by the drug administration ritual not followed by the central effects of the drug (Experiments 2A and 2B), this hyperalgesic CR being subject to experimental extinction (Experiment 2B); and (d) mere presentation of those environmental cues previously associated with the narcotic, when presented in conjunction with a placebo, is an effective procedure for extinguishing established morphine tolerance (Experiment 3). The conclusions concerning the mechanism of morphine tolerance in the rat are, of course, limited to the relatively small dose of the drug (5 mg/kg) and to the analgesia-evaluation situation used in these experiments (although the hot plate procedure is perhaps the most commonly used of the simple assessment techniques for pharmacologically induced analgesia; see Evans, 1964).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence relevant to the second interpretation is limited. The limbic system is known to influence sensory input (Ball, 1967;Cazard, 1959;Lorens & Brown, 1967;Redding, 1967;Rose & Frommer, 1969), and septal lesions have been demonstrated to decrease threshold for shock needed to elicit "jump" responses (Lints & Harvey, 1969;Rose & Frommer, 1969), a standard measure of pain reactivity (Evans, 1964). However, Blanchard and Fial (1968) failed to find a clearcut effect of hippocampal, septal, or cingulum lesions on a similar measure.…”
Section: Extinction Phasementioning
confidence: 99%