2019
DOI: 10.37237/100303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Critical Review of Research on Language Learning Strategies used by Arab Learners of English

Abstract: More than four decades have passed since the language learning strategy (LLS) concept was first brought to wide attention by Joan Rubin (1975). Although LLS research is prolific, it has faced challenges regarding its conceptual and methodological nature. These apparent weaknesses have encouraged some proponents of LLS research (e.g. Oxford, 2011; Rose et al, 2018) to conduct a systematic review of previous LLS research, with the aim of identifying the nature of the vigorous attempts to abandon the construct of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These meta-strategies are metacognitive, meta-affective, metamotivational, and metasocial strategies (Oxford, 2016). Her taxonomy was again open to a number of debates as some theorists (Dörnyei, 2005;Hajar, 2019) argued that success in language learning cannot be assessed through the frequency of strategy use alone.…”
Section: Literature Review the Concept Of Language Learning Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These meta-strategies are metacognitive, meta-affective, metamotivational, and metasocial strategies (Oxford, 2016). Her taxonomy was again open to a number of debates as some theorists (Dörnyei, 2005;Hajar, 2019) argued that success in language learning cannot be assessed through the frequency of strategy use alone.…”
Section: Literature Review the Concept Of Language Learning Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, nine out of eleven studies with qualitative or mixed methods approaches relied heavily on interviews to collect qualitative data. These characteristics were also described expansively in other reviews of LLS [61], [62].…”
Section: Methodology Of Research On Lls In Efl Contextsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The level of the compensation strategies shows that they are medium. Table 8 shows the students' gender analysis also has a p value that is greater than 0.05, indicating that there is no significant difference in the students' use of compensation strategies based on gender (Hajar, 2019). The p value for the compensation strategies provides an indication that there is a significant positive correlation between the students' use of compensation learning strategies with the SILL (Zaker, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%