2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.03.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical review of patient safety indicators attributed to trauma surgeons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While capturing comorbidities and severity at the time of clinical intake or admission may favorably impact a facility's rating or reimbursement, if this practice is applied to events occurring during or after hospitalization, it could have the opposite effect. Indeed, others have raised concerns that coding and documentation inconsistencies may limit the validity of employing PSI to evaluate hospital performance [19,53,54].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While capturing comorbidities and severity at the time of clinical intake or admission may favorably impact a facility's rating or reimbursement, if this practice is applied to events occurring during or after hospitalization, it could have the opposite effect. Indeed, others have raised concerns that coding and documentation inconsistencies may limit the validity of employing PSI to evaluate hospital performance [19,53,54].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,[27][28][29][30] Although modifiable factors (e.g., staffing models) associated with improving hospital FTR rates have been described in the literature, lack of complication-specific mortality rate metrics is an impediment to understanding both the magnitude of preventable deaths occurring and the impact of interventions designed to improve recognition, diagnosis, and response to nonpreventable complications. [31][32][33] The need to stratify performance at the complication level is also important because prevention, recognition, response methods used to mitigate the risk associated with each complication are often different. Therefore, if quality leaders can understand specific areas where they need to improve, they can develop and implement specific prevention "bundles" and/or rescue systems to reduce the corresponding complication and its mortality risk.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially important as research shows that it is not prevention, but recognition and response to complications that decreases FTR and improves patient outcomes 23,27–30 . Although modifiable factors (e.g., staffing models) associated with improving hospital FTR rates have been described in the literature, lack of complication-specific mortality rate metrics is an impediment to understanding both the magnitude of preventable deaths occurring and the impact of interventions designed to improve recognition, diagnosis, and response to nonpreventable complications 31–33 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%