2015
DOI: 10.3390/ma8030932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Critical Review of Dental Implant Materials with an Emphasis on Titanium versus Zirconia

Abstract: Abstract:The goal of the current publication is to provide a comprehensive literature review on the topic of dental implant materials. The following paper focuses on conventional titanium implants and more recently introduced and increasingly popular zirconia implants. Major subtopics include the material science and the clinical considerations involving both implant materials and the influence of their physical properties on the treatment outcome. Titanium remains the gold standard for the fabrication of oral… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
291
0
9

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 441 publications
(302 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
(179 reference statements)
2
291
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be further inferred that no other major differences were detected between Ti-SLA and Y-TZP-SS, which demonstrates the promising potential for surface modified Y-TZP ceramics in dental implantology. However, in vivo studies over a healing period of several years ( > 5 years) are needed to recommend rough zirconia materials over titanium for applications in dental implantology [28][29][30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be further inferred that no other major differences were detected between Ti-SLA and Y-TZP-SS, which demonstrates the promising potential for surface modified Y-TZP ceramics in dental implantology. However, in vivo studies over a healing period of several years ( > 5 years) are needed to recommend rough zirconia materials over titanium for applications in dental implantology [28][29][30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implants made from zirconia may be considered as a promising metal free alternative to the well-established titanium implants [1][2][3][4][5][6] . Compared to the natural tooth with its periodontal ligament, the implant-bone interface is rigid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Brånemark et al 1) discovered titanium and bone could be completely integrated, titanium implants have been established as a reliable treatment option for the replacement of missing teeth over forty years 2) . In spite of well-documented biocompatibility and suitability for tooling, it has been reported that titanium can cause unwanted chemical-biological interactions like tissue discoloration 3) and allergic reactions 4) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%