2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7311-5_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Critical Reevaluation of the Role of Acoustic Pressure in Source Localization by Fish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fish may, therefore, rely on detection of each aspect to also use the combination of the sound aspects, like us, to determine the direction of the sound sources. The coherence between the pressure and particle velocity can also be used to extract the particle motion from the ambient noise (Rogers et al, 2012), providing a perceptual strategy against masking, which is known as directional unmasking (Chapman, 1973;Chapman and Hawkins, 1973;Chapman and Johnstone, 1974), especially available to fish that can resolve the 180 directional ambiguity (see, e.g., Buwalda et al, 1982).…”
Section: Potential Range For Masking Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fish may, therefore, rely on detection of each aspect to also use the combination of the sound aspects, like us, to determine the direction of the sound sources. The coherence between the pressure and particle velocity can also be used to extract the particle motion from the ambient noise (Rogers et al, 2012), providing a perceptual strategy against masking, which is known as directional unmasking (Chapman, 1973;Chapman and Hawkins, 1973;Chapman and Johnstone, 1974), especially available to fish that can resolve the 180 directional ambiguity (see, e.g., Buwalda et al, 1982).…”
Section: Potential Range For Masking Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%