2006
DOI: 10.1093/cje/bel028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical realist interpretation of evolutionary growth theorising

Abstract: The article discusses a critical realist interpretation of evolutionary growth theorising by focusing on some of its basic characteristics. The evolutionary ontology is complex, differentiated, structured, systemic, open, ever-changing, and radically uncertain. Its methodology tends to be increasingly based on appreciative theorising, retroductive explanations and interdisciplinary analysis. After discussing these features, the article suggests that critical realism may indeed constitute an important philosoph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a recent field of research with a weak theoretical basis – considering the negligible amount of research devoted to theory building in rural entrepreneurship – qualitative analyses tend to be the natural way of producing science, which may then lead to generalised theorisation through appreciative theorising (Castellacci ).…”
Section: Bibliometric Analysis Of Rural Entrepreneurship Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a recent field of research with a weak theoretical basis – considering the negligible amount of research devoted to theory building in rural entrepreneurship – qualitative analyses tend to be the natural way of producing science, which may then lead to generalised theorisation through appreciative theorising (Castellacci ).…”
Section: Bibliometric Analysis Of Rural Entrepreneurship Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In any case, a 'bottom-up' approach surely presupposes that we have at least some idea of what the 'evolutionary processes' we are seeking to analyse actually are. A 'bottom-up' approach -whether a form of 'appreciative theorising' (NELSON, 1995) or what is now becoming known in evolutionary economics as 'history-friendly models' (CASTELLACCI, 2006;MALERBA et al, 1999;MALERBA, 2010) -based on the close empirical examination of concrete specific cases and trends, must almost inevitably involve the use of some sort of guiding theoretical principles or concepts, and these presumably will be evolutionary in nature. After all, if one is interested in economic evolution, it makes sense to think in 'evolutionary' terms, however loosely such ontological preconceptions are framed.…”
Section: Evolutionary Economic Geography: Moving Beyond Generalized Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regional economic restructuring is a recurring theme in studies of industrial development, and recent advancements in the literature have been accompanied by promising insights from the literature on evolutionary theory. Evolutionary perspectives, which emphasize the complexity, heterogeneity and openness of economic development (Aldrich et al, 2008;Boschma & Martin, 2010;Castellacci, 2006;Schreyögg & Sydow, 2010), have become particularly influential in frameworks that analyse innovation and regional industrial development. Concepts such as path development, increasing returns and lock-in are central.…”
Section: Renewal Of Industry Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%